The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Mar 28th, 2024, 8:12am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth (Read 2421 times)
Faisal
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 90

Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Jun 11th, 2008, 12:47pm
 
Hi,

I am looking to perform Analog Mixed Signal Verification. How good is the Verilog-AMS for this task? The digital design is described in RTL and the analog design is using Cadence Spectre Environment.  

What is the preferred methodology?

Kind Regards,
Faisal Mateen.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Stefan
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 124

Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool +
Reply #1 - Jun 11th, 2008, 1:37pm
 
VerilogAMS is pretty fine for that purpose.
You could also use VHDL-AMS or SystemC-AMS but to my knowledge, VerilogAMS is much better understood by most analog designers Smiley
Back to top
 
 
View Profile 16731287   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2384
Silicon Valley
Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool +
Reply #2 - Jun 11th, 2008, 4:25pm
 
I recommend that you take a look around our companion website (www.designers-guide.com). We have a fair amount of material on analog verification (it is what we do).

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Eugene
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 262

Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool +
Reply #3 - Jun 12th, 2008, 12:26am
 
If you plan to use any behavioral analog models, you should consider how you will certify that the models and their circuit counterparts behave the same. If your circuits are implemented in the Cadence environment, I would use VerilogAMS. VerilogAMS is Cadence's flagship modeling language.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool +
Reply #4 - Jun 16th, 2008, 1:27pm
 
Agreed with all the above. Verilog-AMS is very useful for big design work.

http://www.edn.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=ca6426885&q=Jerry+Twom...

The above is something that I did for EDN about a year ago on the topic. Ken contributed his methods to the article.

Jerry T.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Faisal
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 90

Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Reply #5 - Jun 27th, 2008, 6:15am
 
Hi,

Thank you all for replies.  Basically our flow is RTL (Verilog)  and Analog Portion is Schematic composer.

I have one question related to Verilog AMS flow: Does the analog portion required an additional view from foundry?

If yes, what is the view name? what is it called ?  (Why is it needed)


Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 751

Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Reply #6 - Jul 4th, 2008, 9:40pm
 
Faisal,

  In the past AMS Designer required a separate view was required for
the devices in the PDK, in more recent releases that requirement has
been removed. You should probably contact your local support for the
details.

                                                               Best Regards,

                                                                  Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
jbdavid
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 378
Silicon Valley
Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Reply #7 - Jul 15th, 2008, 11:53am
 
as someone who has been using AMS Designer since it first was released in early 2000, I'll suggest that AMS is better for verification than a co-sim solution..
for background info that is NOT on this website (but managed by the Same Guys) .. look at www.bmas-conf.org  lots of good background papers there
but the primary advantage of AMS is that most of the design is netlisted as a Verilog(AMS) netlist.. which gives you all the features of Verilog-2001 (some of 1364-2005) as well as the Analog extensions.. meaning that you can write models to check analog outputs and integrate them with your normal digital verification environment.

Of course the best approach is to start developing your top level testbench using VERY FAST behavioral models.. and then as the schematics finish up and go to layout, you can substitute them in and run enough spot checks to validate that the models are correct..
(not all of them at once.. as that might make the simulation very slow. )

Commonly this issue is raised when the design is done, and spending a n additional 2-3 months learning Verilog, VerilogAMS and writing models is not palatable to management. At this point you won't get the same design/functional coverage as you would with the first approach, but you can run an effective RTL + transistor level sim ulation in a FAST spice type simulator..
AMSUltrasim is one -- and there are other alternatives, some of which can use the Verilog + spectre netlists you are using today.
and if the analog parts aren't too big, you can even run a tolerable (couple of days or a week or so) run in AMS(Spectre)
--
Hoping you're not in that boat..
jbd
Back to top
 
 

jbdavid
Mixed Signal Design Verification
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
rajdeep
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 220
UK
Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Reply #8 - Nov 6th, 2008, 9:09am
 
Quote:
I'll suggest that AMS is better for verification than a co-sim solution.. Quote:


By co-simulation do u mean spectreVerilog type of simulators??

We actually use it and find it very good. The biggest  problem is that  we can use only Verilog-A in spectreVerilog. Time to move onto AMS Designer....but then analog designers take time to trust
a new simulator  :-?

Rajdeep
Back to top
 
 

Design is fun, verification is a requirement.
View Profile   IP Logged
jbdavid
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 378
Silicon Valley
Re: Analog Mixed Signal Verification (Best tool + meth
Reply #9 - Nov 12th, 2008, 6:19pm
 
Yes thats what I mean..
--
there is little "trusting" curve for the analog designers.. once you get the netlisting working right, since the analog simulation engine is still spectre.
There are a lot of mixed signal designs that don't need anything more than spectre-Verilog .. but I have been lucky enough not to work in those domains for the last 7 years.
PLL's are one area where the true mixed signal capability shines..
--good luck
Back to top
 
 

jbdavid
Mixed Signal Design Verification
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.