The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 26th, 2024, 8:42pm
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
CMFB of OTA (Read 9648 times)
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

CMFB of OTA
Oct 30th, 2012, 6:39am
 
Hi,there.
Recently I am designing a OTA used in a front-end S/H for pipeline ADC. The OTA circuit is shown below,  and I dont know how exactly the CMFB is working. The VDD is 3V and CM voltage of input and output are both 1.4v, while using SC CMFB. When simulating, I find that the output CM voltage is affected by other transistors parameters especially the M3 and M4 even with CMFB is working! In other words, the output CM voltage is hard to adjust to the desired value 1.4v, and is susceptible by other transistors with CMFB. I dont know why the CM voltage can not be controlled by CMFB. The DC gain of differential is about 60 dB and the first stage has a gain about 2, so I think the CMFB loop gain is large enough to force deep feedback.

Regards
urian
Back to top
 

ota.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
AnalogDE
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 137

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #1 - Oct 30th, 2012, 5:06pm
 
What does your CMFB circuit look like?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #2 - Oct 30th, 2012, 9:23pm
 
AnalogDE wrote on Oct 30th, 2012, 5:06pm:
What does your CMFB circuit look like?


Hi,AnalogDE, the CMFB is a traditional SC CMFB.
Back to top
 

scc.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
Dan Clement
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 95
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #3 - Oct 31st, 2012, 4:26am
 
Shouldn't m3 and m4 be pmos?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #4 - Oct 31st, 2012, 7:34am
 
Dan Clement wrote on Oct 31st, 2012, 4:26am:
Shouldn't m3 and m4 be pmos?

Hi,It's NMOS for sure.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Dan Clement
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 95
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #5 - Oct 31st, 2012, 7:40pm
 
I've never seen this topology before. From what I see I don't think there is a chance for this circuit to act as an amplifier.

Can you explain how it is supposed to work?  It doesn't make sense to me.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #6 - Oct 31st, 2012, 9:11pm
 
Hi,it's from the JSSC paper " A 10b 20M 35mW Pipeline A/D Converter" by Cho,Mar,1995
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Dan Clement
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 95
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #7 - Nov 1st, 2012, 5:40am
 
I will have to look into that paper.

After a good night of sleep I can now see it as an amp. The gain of the first stage will be quite low.

The signal swing of the first stage will be severely limited by the cmfb as you can't pull the drains of the input transistors any higher than the cmfb node minusvavthreshold voltage.

You are probably having a startup issue where the input transistors are being clamped by the cmfb source followers or you are having a swing issue and losing gain.

You will need to level shift the cmfb to a high enough voltage to avoid this.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #8 - Nov 1st, 2012, 9:26pm
 
Yes, the gain of first stage is low, between 1-2, the drain of input transistor is around 800mv with the bias, but the output will change largely with SF transistors parameters.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Lex
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 201
Eindhoven, Holland
Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #9 - Nov 5th, 2012, 4:25am
 
Are the problems gone with a higher common mode voltage? Then I guess you know the answer to your problems.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
boe
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 615

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #10 - Nov 5th, 2012, 4:30am
 
Lex wrote on Nov 5th, 2012, 4:25am:
Are the problems gone with a higher common mode voltage? Then I guess you know the answer to your problems.

I"d try lower (input) common mode voltage...
- B O E
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #11 - Nov 5th, 2012, 7:38am
 
Lex wrote on Nov 5th, 2012, 4:25am:
Are the problems gone with a higher common mode voltage? Then I guess you know the answer to your problems.

Do you mean the output CM voltage? If so, I am afraid I cant afford this as the CM voltage is determined by BIAS and it tends to be smaller. Actually, I find that with this cmfb, the DC OP is very important to guarantee that the CMFB loop has enough gain.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
boe
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 615

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #12 - Nov 5th, 2012, 11:08am
 
urian wrote on Nov 5th, 2012, 7:38am:
...
Do you mean the output CM voltage? If so, I am afraid I cant afford this as the CM voltage is determined by BIAS and it tends to be smaller.
I believe Lex meant changing it to test the circuit behavior.
Quote:
Actually, I find that with this cmfb, the DC OP is very important ...
As I'd expect given the topology.
Quote:
... to guarantee that the CMFB loop has enough gain.
So what is your question?

- B O E
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Lex
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 201
Eindhoven, Holland
Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #13 - Nov 6th, 2012, 12:03am
 
boe wrote on Nov 5th, 2012, 4:30am:
Lex wrote on Nov 5th, 2012, 4:25am:
Are the problems gone with a higher common mode voltage? Then I guess you know the answer to your problems.

I"d try lower (input) common mode voltage...
- B O E


I think we're on the same page. Wink
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
urian
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30

Re: CMFB of OTA
Reply #14 - Nov 6th, 2012, 2:19am
 
Sorry I made a mistake.When I re-check the circuit, I find that it is because the DC OP of output CM voltage will change largely with SF W/L, and this will put great pressure on CMFB.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.