The Designer's Guide Community Forum
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl Simulators >> Circuit Simulators >> The uncompromise among Transient, HB and ENV??? https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1198831555 Message started by aboco on Dec 28th, 2007, 12:45am |
Title: The uncompromise among Transient, HB and ENV??? Post by aboco on Dec 28th, 2007, 12:45am Hello everyone, I am working on LogAmp detector development using ADS tool. Used topology: There are the uncompromises among Transient (Trans), Harmonic Balance (HB) and Envelope (ENV) simulations when I try to observe output time domain response as following plots: The uncompromising points are: 1. Trans simulation introduces very different output steady level (compare with ENV and HB) 2. Trans and ENV simulation show opposite equilibrium-reaching process Could anyone give me comment on the differences? Thanks alot for help aboco |
Title: Re: The uncompromise among Transient, HB and ENV?? Post by Stefan on Dec 30th, 2007, 10:20am What type of OpAmp/Detector did you use ? When reaching nonlinearities in the stages, the results may vary quite a lot due to different algorithms from the simulators ... |
Title: Re: The uncompromise among Transient, HB and ENV?? Post by pancho_hideboo on Jan 7th, 2008, 12:36am Hi. What type of signal source do you use for TRAN and ENV analysis ? Do you use "VtSine" for TRAN and "V_1Tone" for HB and ENV ? "VtSine" with phase=0 is Sine wave. "V_1Tone" with phase=0 is Cosine wave. You shoud set phase=-90deg in "V_1Tone" in ENV analysis. And you can use "V_1Tone" even in TRAN analysis. But still there exists discrepancy about steady state value for TRAN and HB. Could you show me netlist portions about signal source and analysis definitions ? |
The Designer's Guide Community Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.2.2! YaBB © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved. |