The Designer's Guide Community Forum
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl
Measurements >> Phase Noise and Jitter Measurements >> difference between phase noise testing and simulation
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1217903628

Message started by xuel on Aug 4th, 2008, 7:33pm

Title: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Post by xuel on Aug 4th, 2008, 7:33pm

In simulation the phasenoise is very good, is 100dbc at 1MHz.
But in testing, phasenoise is only 60dbc at 1MHz.
But the jitter is not large, 20ps peak-to-peak measured from oscilloscope.
Why is the measured phasenoise so bad?

Title: Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Post by luantan on Aug 10th, 2008, 8:37am

anybody knows? :)

Title: Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Post by ACWWong on Aug 11th, 2008, 12:30am

I'm assuming your simulation gives -100dBc/Hz

In such a case your measurement shows about -95dBc/Hz at 1MHz offset.
That is -60dBc in a 3kHz RBW, so you need to adjust the marker by 10*logRBW=34.8 dB.

Often the analyser has the marker on noise function which will take into account the RBW automatically (and more accurately).

So in fact you are 5 to 6 dB of where you expect to be. The reasons for this can be many e.g. discrepenacy in models, simulation setup issues, measurement issues, PCB design, noise pickup etc.....

Title: Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Post by iaman on Sep 12th, 2008, 8:32am


ACWWong wrote on Aug 11th, 2008, 12:30am:
I'm assuming your simulation gives -100dBc/Hz

In such a case your measurement shows about -95dBc/Hz at 1MHz offset.
That is -60dBc in a 3kHz RBW, so you need to adjust the marker by 10*logRBW=34.8 dB.

Often the analyser has the marker on noise function which will take into account the RBW automatically (and more accurately).

So in fact you are 5 to 6 dB of where you expect to be. The reasons for this can be many e.g. discrepenacy in models, simulation setup issues, measurement issues, PCB design, noise pickup etc.....


Great.
from the test picture, we can find some details:
1. RBW is 3kHz, so we should  normilized the PN to dBm/Hz.
2. the  Spectrum analiyzer power dector is peak dector , you should change the power dector to rms dector.
2.

Title: Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Post by kriyang on Sep 15th, 2008, 12:53am

The phase noise at higher offset frequencies is generally limited to thermal or white noise floor of your load. If you are using a resistive load you should expect higher noise floor.

The Designer's Guide Community Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.