The Designer's Guide Community Forum
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl
Design >> Analog Design >> How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336536890

Message started by Larry_80 on May 8th, 2012, 9:14pm

Title: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by Larry_80 on May 8th, 2012, 9:14pm

Hello All,
Does the vgs-vth for optimum FOM =  (gm/Id)*ft  get larger as technology size decreases? And also, do i have to characterize this FOM for both NMOS and PMOS or i can just do for one and use for sizing my transistors?

Thanks in advance

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by vivkr on May 10th, 2012, 5:17am

Well! I would expect the Vgs-Vth optimum numbers to scale down as well because there is a dependence on "beta", the current gain factor which scales with technology.

However, I am not sure if you can actually operate your FET at the optimal Vgs-Vth. I noticed already in very old technologies that the current density gets so high at this point that you would have all sorts of problems getting the required amount of current into the transistor.

In older processes, people sometimes looked away if they were doing this for a handful of FETs. In the new ones, electromigration might make or break your design. At any rate, you will probably need a customized layout of your device.

Why do you ask by the way? Are you trying to decide on the technology to use?

Vivek

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by RobG on May 10th, 2012, 10:06am

Doesn't the optimum gm/Id occur for small Vgs-Vt?, i.e.  lowest current density? The problem I run into is leakage current, especially at hot temperatures.

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by ACWWong on May 10th, 2012, 8:29pm

Hi Rob, I think you missed the *ft part of the FOM.

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by vivkr on May 14th, 2012, 5:53am

and I missed the (gm/Id) part of the question, looking only at fT...

I guess if you are trying to look at both (gm/Id) which gets maximized for low Vgs-Vth and fT, which gets maximized at higher Vgs-Vth, then you might end up with reasonable Vgs-Vth at the end. So my comment about it being difficult to drive in that much current may not hold.

As to whether the optimum scales with technology, I would expect so for the reasons outlined earlier.

Vivek

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by RobG on May 17th, 2012, 9:57am


ACWWong wrote on May 10th, 2012, 8:29pm:
Hi Rob, I think you missed the *ft part of the FOM.


I did miss that. Thanks.

Title: Re: How does vgs-vth for optimum (gm/Id)*ft vary as technology gets smaller
Post by ACWWong on May 18th, 2012, 9:18pm


vivkr wrote on May 14th, 2012, 5:53am:
and I missed the (gm/Id) part of the question, looking only at fT...

I guess if you are trying to look at both (gm/Id) which gets maximized for low Vgs-Vth and fT, which gets maximized at higher Vgs-Vth, then you might end up with reasonable Vgs-Vth at the end. So my comment about it being difficult to drive in that much current may not hold.

As to whether the optimum scales with technology, I would expect so for the reasons outlined earlier.

Vivek

My experience in the technologies its usually at a quite low overdrive, but as you say its technology dependant, but also dependant to the particular device type and sizes you're looking to use.

The Designer's Guide Community Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.