The Designer's Guide Community Forum

The Designer's Guide Community Forum
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl
Simulators >> Circuit Simulators >> ADEXL - Comparing corner results
https://designers-guide.org/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1398193272

Message started by pcardoso73 on Apr 22^nd, 2014, 12:01pm

Title: ADEXL - Comparing corner results
Post by pcardoso73 on Apr 22^nd, 2014, 12:01pm

Dear all,

I would like to pose to you some questions regarding ADEXL:

1 - is there a way (Ocean maybe), to generate an expression at ADEXL that returns the name of the runing test ?
2 - When a run finishes with errors, is it possible to run just the corner(s) having errors and save all the results in the same run (eg. Interactive.0)?
3 - is it possible to do some mathematical treatment inside ADEXL of the results obtained across diverse before exporting the complete table ?

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,
Pedro

Title: Re: ADEXL - Comparing corner results
Post by Andrew Beckett on Apr 26^th, 2014, 1:48pm

Some answers:
1. I don't think this is possible with a public API. Why do you want it anyway?
2. You can use RMB->Re-run error/unfinished points over the history name in the data view assistant
3. I don't know what you mean - please clarify.

Regards,

Andrew.

Title: Re: ADEXL - Comparing corner results
Post by pcardoso73 on Apr 30^th, 2014, 9:44am

Hello Andrew,

Thanks for your reply.

I am runing simulations for several tests with ADEXL. As I have to do post-processing of the data, I need to save all the data into .csv files, having a csv per test. As the number of tests is large, I would like to automatize these tasks somehow.
Let's say I have tests with names as:
test_tran1, test_tran2 ... test_tranN.

Is it possible to generate a script that takes each test and saves the data on a csv, where the name of the file is the same as the name of the test ?

Regarding question 3, I believe it makes no sense because I was trying to do part of the post-processing on ADEXL, instead of using Matlab.

Your answer to question 2 works perfectly. Thanks.

Best regards,
Pedro