The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 3rd, 2024, 10:08am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Simulation result different StarHspice Vs Spectre (Read 2430 times)
nano_RF
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 50
madison
Simulation result different StarHspice Vs Spectre
Mar 25th, 2005, 6:04pm
 
Hello All,

We designed a 32 bit adder(Just wrote a spice netlist) and simulated with Star Hspice and it works fine. Then we created schematic and simulated with spectre. Unfortunately with spectre our circuit doesn't work.

To make it more simple I simulated a single inverter in spectre and then took cdl.out(netlist) from the schematic. Later I simulated it with Star-Hspice, and figured out a delay difference of 10 ps (with 10f F at the output node) . I am using tsmc018 (tt) model file. So i use mm018.scs "tt" in spectre and mm018.l "tt" in Hspice.  I am pretty sure that I havn't made any mistakes in specifying the model file and nominal parameters.

So, can anybody tell me how these two simulator can give different results?

Thanks
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Andrew Beckett
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Life, don't talk to
me about Life...

Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK
Re: Simulation result different StarHspice Vs Spec
Reply #1 - Mar 29th, 2005, 8:46pm
 
When you say "our circuit doesn't work" it's not clear what doesn't work...

As for the second example, my guess is that the CDL netlist you produced does not contain any AD, AS, PD, PS terms for the mosfets, whereas the spectre netlist probably does. So you probably have differences in the source/drain area and perimeter terms for the devices, which will alter the capacitances, and hence could alter the delay.

If you use a proper HSPICE interface (like hspiceD or the older hspiceS), rather than a netlist format that is intended for physical verification (where you would not be verifying source/drain areas), I suspect this problem would go away.

If this doesn't explain it, perhaps you could post the two netlists for the single inverter here? I guess they're not proprietary!

Regards,

Andrew.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.