Andrew Beckett
Senior Fellow
![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif)
Offline
![](https://designers-guide.org/forum/avatars/elmerfudd.gif)
Life, don't talk to me about Life...
Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK
|
Hi Ronny,
Are you using IC5141? As I mentioned, the pole-zero cancellation can help in this case - however, it may be that in your case the circuit is too big for the current algorithm. There were plans for a sparse solver as well as a detailed solver (we have detailed solver right now), but the sparse solver has not been implemented yet.
I don't know of a way of doing this from the ac results, sorry.
Regards,
Andrew.
|