Andrew Beckett
Senior Fellow
![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif) ![* *](https://designers-guide.org/forum/Templates/Forum/default/starsilver.gif)
Offline
![](https://designers-guide.org/forum/avatars/elmerfudd.gif)
Life, don't talk to me about Life...
Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK
|
I decided to save indysjl a little effort, and tried it myself.
Negative delay values do work.
Geoffrey - it's not quite the same as your suggestion, because with a positive delay, the pulse does not start until after the delay has happened - so the behaviour is different at the beginning of the simulation. If negative delay weren't supported though, it would be a reasonable alternative.
I've attached a picture showing no delay, a negative (-5ns) delay, and Geoffrey's suggestion (25ns delay, since the period is 30ns).
Regards,
Andrew.
|