Dear Experts,

I'm not sure if I run into a bug or did not understand the LRM.
SimVison gave me a very hard time (chrashed) before I could figure out the root cause. Please see belows test lines commented with OK or NG.

my table data is the same as in the LRM 2.3.1
Code:

# 2-D table model sample example
#                              
# y x f(x,y)                    
#y=0 isoline                    
	0.0 	1.0 	0.5                    
	0.0 	2.0 	1.0                    
	0.0 	3.0 	1.5                    
	0.0 	4.0 	2.0                    
	0.0 	5.0 	2.5                    
	0.0 	6.0 	3.0                    
#y=0.5 isoline                  
	0.5 	1.0 	1.0                    
	0.5 	3.0 	2.0                    
	0.5 	5.0 	3.0                    
#y=1.0 isoline  
	1.0 	1.0 	1.5                
	1.0 	2.0 	2.0
	1.0 	4.0 	3.0


 

My trial lines are below:
Code:

		// I(corePower) <+ ($table_model( 0.0  , V(corePower) , "../_ams_table_models/Test2d.dat"  )) ; // OK      
		// I(corePower) <+ ($table_model( 0.0 , tPosOffsetTime , "../_ams_table_models/Test2d.dat"  )) ; //OK      
		// I(corePower) <+ ($table_model( 1   , tPosOffsetTime , "../_ams_table_models/Test2d.dat"  )) ; // NG
		// I(corePower) <+ ($table_model( 1.0 , tPosOffsetTime , "../_ams_table_models/Test2d.dat"  )) ; // OK
		// I(corePower) <+ ($table_model( 0   , tPosOffsetTime , "../_ams_table_models/Test2d.dat"  )) ; // NG

 

It looks like if the isoline (first arg) is passed a integer string I run into problems. I have alos tested a variable as arg 1 which was defined as interger. This leads to the same fail.

The LRM says:
Quote:


For a string integer this is may be not applicable, but if I pass a variable nad the function expects a real implicit conversion schould take place.

Could sameone confirm that this is really a bug and not a wrong usage of AMS by myself ?

Thanks a lot

RolfK