The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 29th, 2024, 10:20pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB (Read 13293 times)
RobertNew
Guest




Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Dec 10th, 2003, 7:58pm
 
Hi all analog designers,

I am currently designing a fully differential folded cascode (FC) opamp for switched capacitor (SC) circuits.  It's well known that we need a CMFB circuit to properly define the output common mode voltage and switched capacitor (SC) CMFB is chosen to implement this CMFB circuit.  My question is how do I simulate the gain, slew-rate of the FC opamp with this SC CMFB which is sampled-data in nature?  Thanks for your kind help.

Regards,
Robert
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Paul
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 351
Switzerland
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #1 - Dec 10th, 2003, 11:39pm
 
Hi Robert,

for DC and small signal analysis, you may replace the switched cap CMFB by a resistive one, using equivalent resistors as given by the capacitor values and the switching frequency.

Paul
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #2 - Dec 11th, 2003, 7:34am
 
SpectreRF can be used to compute the small-signal characteristics (gain, bandwidth, noise, etc.) of your SC-CMFB amplifier.  To do so, perform a PSS analysis with only the clock applied, then perform a PAC, PXF, and/or PNoise analysis to compute the small-signal characteristics. This process is described more fully in Simulating switched-capacitor filters with SpectreRF at http://www.designers-guide.com/Analysis/.

To simulate the slew rate, you could use envelope following, but transient is probably best unless the slewrate is very slow relative to the clock frequency.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
RobertNew
Guest




Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #3 - Dec 11th, 2003, 7:20pm
 
Hi Paul and Ken,

Thank you for your replies.
Ken, could you suggest similar tools in Mentor Graphics that I can use for the steps you mention (such as PSS etc.)?

Cheers,
Robert
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #4 - Dec 11th, 2003, 10:16pm
 
No, Mentor does not really offer anything suitable.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Paul
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 351
Switzerland
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #5 - Dec 12th, 2003, 12:47am
 
I am using Mentor Tools and I especially like the extended control language of Eldo, but that's a personal point of view I don't want to argue about. True that MGC doesn't offer the kind of simulation you ask for.

What you can do, other than computing the equivalent resistor value and replacing it in the schematic, is run a transient simulation up to reaching equilibrium (all nodes have reached their correct operating point). From that point you can run AC or noise simulations (not sure whether you can use harmonic balance from Eldo RF, I'm only using "plain" Eldo).

I copied the following section from the Eldo documentation:
--------
AC in the middle of a .TRAN
Whenever a .AC command, a .TRAN command, and a .OP command containing time specifications are in the .cir file, then an AC analysis will be performed at each of these time points. In the following example Eldo will perform AC, NOISE and TRAN analyses at time 0, time 5n, and time 7n:
.AC DEC 10 1 1e9
.NOISE v(5) vin 70
.TRAN 1n 20n
.OP 5n 7n
--------
I never used PAC, PXF in SpectreRF so I cannot really compare. For my analog (not RF) designs, this works fine. Does this answer your question?

Paul
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #6 - Dec 12th, 2003, 3:06pm
 
Paul,
The approach you describe does not really work for switched-capacitor circuits. Consider a traditional SC filter. Generally, at no point in time there is no direct path from the input to the output. So if you run an AC analysis during one clock phase, you get 0 gain. Then if you run another AC analysis during the other phase you again get 0 gain. This approach tells you that there is no signal transmission from input to output, which is clearly wrong.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Paul
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 351
Switzerland
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #7 - Dec 14th, 2003, 11:42pm
 
Ken,

you are totally right that this doesn't work for SC filters. I do use this kind of simulation for SC amplifiers where the CM takes some clock periods for converging to its operating point, but where the voltage gain is defined by a capacitor ratio, i.e. there is a AC direct path from input to output.

It depends on Roberts topology whether this kind of simulation is usable for him or not. As far as I understood his first post, he only considers the bare amplifier and the SC CMFB. In that case I believe he can use this kind of simulation. Am I wrong?

Paul
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
ravi
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6
Bangalore, India
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #8 - Dec 24th, 2003, 4:00am
 
Hi Ken and Paul,
Is it ok to use TPUNCH and TRANAC options in spice. I don't know if it is available with all versions of spice but many commercial versions may be having.
TPUNCH punches the operating point at the specified time and TRANAC does the AC analysis at that operating point.
I don't know how far is it accurate. Anybody who know more about this can comment on this.

regards
Ravi
Back to top
 
 

Even impossible says, I 'm possible.
View Profile   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #9 - Dec 24th, 2003, 9:23am
 
Ravi,
I've never heard of TPUNCH and TRANAC, but if I understood your explanation, the transient and AC analyses in Spectre can be configured to do the same thing. I occasionally use such an analysis approach to provide some insight as to how the circuit is behaving, but I am always somewhat dubious of the results as this approach violates the basic assumptions behind operating points and AC analysis.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Stan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #10 - Dec 30th, 2003, 6:51am
 
Ken and Paul,

Could you give some more detail on how to simulate the open loop gain and frequency responce of fully differential OPAMP with SC CMFB? If I replace the capacitors with equivalent resistors, will the gain and output swing be affected?
Thank you.

Stan
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
The_One
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 14

Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #11 - Jan 1st, 2004, 12:32am
 
Hi Stan

You can use the Spectre RF simulator....the analysis is called PSS and PAC analysis.

By the way, do you know how to design the SC CMFB? any general guidelines, eg. how to choose the correct value for the capacitors? thx
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Paul
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 351
Switzerland
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #12 - Jan 1st, 2004, 3:01am
 
Hi Stan,

you should have a look at the following post:
http://www.designers-guide.com/Forum/?board=analog_design;action=display;num=106...

If you use Cadence tools, as the One mentions, you don't need to replace the SC by equivalent resistors. Have a look at Ken's answer above. If you don't use Spectre, equivalent resistors may solve your simulation problem (also discussed above). If the capacitor values are chosen correctly, they will not considerably degrade your amplifier performance.

The One, I already answered this question in your other post:
http://www.designers-guide.com/Forum/?board=analog_design;action=display;num=107...
Maybe it is not clear?

Paul
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Shano
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Taiwan
Re: Fully Differential FC opamp SC CMFB
Reply #13 - Jun 7th, 2007, 10:20pm
 
Hello all experienced guys:

I am new here and new about SC_CMFB design.
I know this post is three years ago!!
I have some thoughts on this topic,
Could anyone comment on it and enlighten me

Robert said "designing a fully differential folded cascode (FC) opamp for switched capacitor (SC) circuits". The OPamp is used for discrete-time
applications. The OP gain which he concerned about is the gain in some phase rather than an averaged gain. If we use a resistor to replace the switched-capacitor or just do PSS/PAC simulation, we will get a lower gain.
In this case, we just do a transient simulations followed by AC simulation.
Then, we will get what we want. Is this right?

Shano







Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.