The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 31st, 2024, 3:26pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
PAC result of SC-CMFB not correct (Read 2244 times)
jimmy
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 32

PAC result of SC-CMFB not correct
Nov 25th, 2004, 2:22pm
 
Hi,

I tryied to simulate the gain and banswidth of my folded cascode with SC-CMFB. Nothing is special in my circuit.

The first method I used the way ywguo proposed on the forum, which replace the SC with equivalent resisotors and then AC simulation. I got about 69dB DC gain.

The second method I used is to  use a ideal CMFB composed of VCVS to run AC simulation and I got similar results as that in the first method.

However, when I used PSS and PAC to simulate the circuit, I got only 53dB DC gain. I checked the DC voltages of the differential output, they are about what I want I think the CMFB works.

I have no idea why the DC gain from PAC is so low, hope someone can give me a hand.

I guess it is due to some loading of my CMFB to the opamp. When I inserted a buffer (VCVS) between my opamp output and CMFB, I could get 69dB with PAC simulation. So how can I get around this problem? I use only 100f and 200f Caps in my CMFB. They are pretty small, aren't they?

Btw, how can I check DC operating points, such as gm, working region, etc. after running PSS analysis.

thanks a lot,
jimmy
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Nov 25th, 2004, 6:24pm by jimmy »  
View Profile   IP Logged
sissi
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 4

Re: PAC result of SC-CMFB not correct
Reply #1 - May 7th, 2012, 12:43am
 
I have the same question,some can explain this?thx
Back to top
 
 
View Profile sissi   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.