Designer’s Guide Community

Chromatik

New Member

Offline

Posts: 5

FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
May 29^th, 2006, 6:58am

Hello, all !

I've been quite surprised when I've tested in Eldo something as simple as this:
The source:
v_sin_source sin_source ground sin ( 0 1 1k 0 0 0 )
The action:
TRAN 15m
.OPTFOUR TSTART=(0m) TSTOP=(15m) NBPT=(16*2048) DISPLAY_INPUT=1
.PLOT TRAN V(sin_source)
.FOUR LABEL = FFT_sin_source V(sin_source)
.PLOT FOUR FOURDB(FFT_sin_source)

First, I've got odd harmonics... (3kHz, 5kHz and so on...) ??!?
Then, in EZwave, if I compare the FFT obtained by this method (up) and a FFT under EZwave, levels are not the same !?!!

Maybe it's obvious, but... I don't see the errors...
If you could help me, it will be very kind !

Thanks a lot in advance Wink

Regards

EDIT: I've changed the NBPT up to 256*2048 and it "fit" more... now the other problem is "why these harmonics ??"

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 29^th, 2006, 8:31am by Chromatik »

IP Logged

Geoffrey_Coram

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1999
Massachusetts, USA

Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
Reply #1 - May 30^th, 2006, 4:20am

There are a number of reasons you might get different answers:
1) the time-domain data may not have enough digits of precision in the output file (whereas Eldo's internal .FOUR can use full precision)
2) the time-domain data may not store enough timepoints
3) the time-domain data may not store the timepoints on an even grid (eg, one might put lots of points where the data is changing rapidly)

Back to top

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.

IP Logged

Chromatik

New Member

Offline

Posts: 5

Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
Reply #2 - May 30^th, 2006, 7:25am

Thanks, Geoffrey_Coram, for your contribution

I've checked the sinus source resolution... and it's not "sharp" (app. 3μs) at all
Configuring the .TRAN analysis, I've changed what -I thought- was the stepping from 1.5ms to 1ns but... without any change !!
So I don't really understand where enhance the time domain data precision

I know it could have different way to consider the answer but, in your opinion,
which of the two simulations could be considered "true": Eldo's .FOUR or the EZWave post-processing FFT ?

Thanks again for your help !
Regards

Guessed I was a kind of newbie, right

Back to top

IP Logged

Geoffrey_Coram

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1999
Massachusetts, USA

Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
Reply #3 - May 31^st, 2006, 9:32am

I would take the .FOUR answer as correct, since Eldo knows everything to full precision, and may or may not be able to convey it all to EZwave.

I don't actually have access to Eldo here, but I know another commercial simulator where you can specify double-precision binary output as opposed to 8-character ascii numbers.

I've always been troubled by the "step" in .TRAN statements, which doesn't always affect the internal timestep used by the simulator in the way I expected.

Back to top

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.

IP Logged

Chromatik

New Member

Offline

Posts: 5

Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
Reply #4 - Jun 1^st, 2006, 5:41am

I hoped you'd agree this way, Geoffrey_Coram !

Now the direct use of this tool is analyzing PLL output signals.
Here's the result of the frequency simulation (input signal: sin 1kHz)

In pink, the Eldo FFT (.OPTFOUR TSTART=0 TSTOP=(15m) NBPT=(1024*2048) INTERPOLATE=1)
In blue, the EZWave FFT (TSTART=1.25m TSTOP=14.25m NBTP=1048576 -> sampling frequency ≈ 80MHz)

If I calculate the harmonic distorsion with both methods... the result isn't quite the same !
The growth of the harmonic level still a problem...
Any idea ?

Thanks again for your help, Geoffrey_Coram !

Back to top

IP Logged

Geoffrey_Coram Senior Fellow Offline Posts: 1999 Massachusetts, USA	Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave Reply #5 - Jun 2^nd, 2006, 4:00am I don't have any further insight into your specific situation, sorry.
Back to top	If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time. IP Logged

Chromatik New Member Offline Posts: 5	Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave Reply #6 - Jun 6^th, 2006, 1:39am Nevermind, thanks again for your help ! I'll try to ask the technical engineer in here about that...
Back to top	IP Logged

hig

New Member

Offline

Posts: 1
France

Re: FFT description in Eldo & EZwave
Reply #7 - Nov 23^rd, 2006, 5:44am

Computation gives the same result in fact, but Eldo does not compute the FFT directly on the waveform generated but on a optimized one for FFT computation, with equally-space time value points.
It is that waveform named FFT_INPUT(...) that appears in your folder TRAN when you put the option DISPLAY_INPUT=1 in the OPTFOUR command.
Then if you do FFT computation on this waveform with EZwave, it will give you the same result.
--> but be careful, because the waveform FFT_INPUT is not of the good type, you will have to do the computation on real part of FFT_INPUT. To have the real part, just enter in the waveform calculator : real(FFT_INPUT(...))

Back to top

IP Logged