The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 16th, 2024, 6:07pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
direct versus indirect semiconductors (Read 9803 times)
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
direct versus indirect semiconductors
Jun 16th, 2006, 3:15am
 
Devices for optical detection make use of direct semiconductors for example GaAs which have their maximum of the valence band at the same location as the minimum of the conduction band in k-E space, whereas indirect semiconductors like Si have their conduction band minimum on another k value than the valence band maximum, which results in a need for an additional electron-phonon interaction and hence in a less efficient detection process.

So now my question: What is the physical cause that explains why a semiconductor material has its conduction band minimum and valence band maximum not at the same k value?
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Jun 16th, 2006, 5:08am by mkaragou »  
View Profile   IP Logged
Geoffrey_Coram
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1999
Massachusetts, USA
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #1 - Jun 16th, 2006, 5:12am
 
As I understand it, the crystal structure determines the energy and momentum of the electron orbitals (states), and there's no particular reason that the highest occupied state and the lowest unoccupied state should have the same momentum.  I mean, even if you go back to a single atom and look at the orbitals, they are shaped differently as you go from s to p to d etc.
Back to top
 
 

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #2 - Jun 16th, 2006, 5:36am
 
If I remember correctly the lattice structure for GaAs and Si is absolutely the same, apart from the fact that for GaAs two different atom types are involved.

So is it just by chance that some semiconductors are direct and some others are indirect?!?!

I am reading for the second time the very well written book from Kevin Brennan "Physics of Semiconductors" CUP that explains the electrical engineer the world of quantum mechanics and band structure formation in the semiconductor lattice,  to get the answer of the question stated above, but I was not able to find the answer,yet.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Geoffrey_Coram
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1999
Massachusetts, USA
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #3 - Jun 19th, 2006, 5:42am
 
I wouldn't say it was "by chance" but my impression is that the equations are so complicated that one can't really hope to predict direct vs indirect simply by knowing the crystal structure.
Back to top
 
 

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #4 - Jun 21st, 2006, 11:10pm
 
Geoffrey_Coram wrote on Jun 19th, 2006, 5:42am:
I wouldn't say it was "by chance" but my impression is that the equations are so complicated that one can't really hope to predict direct vs indirect simply by knowing the crystal structure.


Hi Geoffrey,

I am not sure if the E-k plot cannot be found directly through calculations, although it might need a lot more background in this field. How do we actually know about the E-k plots of Si and GaAs in the first place? I think these have probably been calculated, perhaps with the aid of a computer. I would not imagine that these are measured. What do you think?

Regards
Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #5 - Jun 22nd, 2006, 3:43am
 
vivkr wrote on Jun 21st, 2006, 11:10pm:
I am not sure if the E-k plot cannot be found directly through calculations


The E-k plot is found by calculation but my question was if an intuitive approach exists that can explain the physical reason why some semiconductors are direct whereas others are indirect.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Croaker
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 235

Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #6 - Jun 24th, 2006, 2:20pm
 
This page is always helpful for...semiconductor stuff.  Still, I wouldn't say there is a good physical reason revealed there...

I tend to agree with Geoffrey that with this material, physical and intuitive are sometimes better left behind in favor of equations.

http://britneyspears.ac/physics/indirect/indirect.htm
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #7 - Jun 26th, 2006, 3:53am
 
Croaker wrote on Jun 24th, 2006, 2:20pm:
I tend to agree with Geoffrey that with this material, physical and intuitive are sometimes better left behind in favor of equations.


Oh from my point of view, that is a big error that engineers tend to do,because without intuition no invention is possible either.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Croaker
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 235

Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #8 - Jun 26th, 2006, 6:51am
 
mkaragou wrote on Jun 26th, 2006, 3:53am:
Croaker wrote on Jun 24th, 2006, 2:20pm:
I tend to agree with Geoffrey that with this material, physical and intuitive are sometimes better left behind in favor of equations.


Oh from my point of view, that is a big error that engineers tend to do,because without intuition no invention is possible either.


That's true in general...my point was that quantum physics don't lend themselves quite so much to intuition as say classical Newtonian physics.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #9 - Jun 27th, 2006, 3:00am
 
Croaker wrote on Jun 26th, 2006, 6:51am:
my point was that quantum physics don't lend themselves quite so much to intuition as say classical Newtonian physics.


Yes this might be true, but sometimes there are these bright moments of understanding...

For example I was always asking myself how it comes that there is an energy band gap in the semiconductor.

A person which bases his understanding solely on equations, would answer that if you put the periodic potential
of the lattice ions in the Schroedinger equation, the solution of the Schroedinger equation with the help of bloch functions
is specified by trigonemtric functions that for some k values are not defined. These forbidden k values correspond to forbidden
energy values.

But this answer lacks any kind of intuitive understanding.

Mr. Brennan on the other hand states in his book that when the k vector falls on the edge of the first Brillouin zone,
standing waves arise because of Bragg reflection and therefore only descrete energy levels are possible and
the propagation of the electron wave is impossible.

But to understand this explanation you have to know what the first brillouin zone in the reciprocal lattice is, you have to
know the principle of Bragg reflection and so on...

I am searching for this kind of explanation to understand the direct/indirect semiconductor phenomenon.

I assume that somehow the symmetry of the ion potential in the elementary lattice cell affects the position of the
conduction band minima and valence band maxima.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Jun 28th, 2006, 12:25am by mkaragou »  
View Profile   IP Logged
Geoffrey_Coram
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1999
Massachusetts, USA
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #10 - Jun 27th, 2006, 6:53am
 
I'm not quite sure where you think you're going with this.  Even if you did have an intuitive understanding of the energy bands, it's not like you can engineer a new kind of atom that would  have just the right electron orbitals to produce a particular direct or indirect bandgap.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I think people have been playing with semiconductors long enough that they've tried all the combinations of 3/5 and 2/6 compounds -- there aren't really that many, and using an isotope probably doesn't affect the energy bands much at all.
Back to top
 
 

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Croaker
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 235

Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #11 - Jun 27th, 2006, 8:38am
 
Geoffrey_Coram wrote on Jun 27th, 2006, 6:53am:
I'm not quite sure where you think you're going with this.  Even if you did have an intuitive understanding of the energy bands, it's not like you can engineer a new kind of atom that would  have just the right electron orbitals to produce a particular direct or indirect bandgap.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I think people have been playing with semiconductors long enough that they've tried all the combinations of 3/5 and 2/6 compounds -- there aren't really that many, and using an isotope probably doesn't affect the energy bands much at all.


I was thinking about that too...I like to understand devices, but I shy away from the gory details that get physicists excited.  Oh well, whatever floats your boat.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
mkaragou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 30
Germany Soest
Re: direct versus indirect semiconductors
Reply #12 - Jun 28th, 2006, 12:44am
 
I am sorry if I bore you.  There are so many other interesting threads in this forum. So just ignore me, if you are not interested in my question!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.