The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Aug 17th, 2024, 2:22pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Decision Feedback Equalizer- Stability analysis (Read 3480 times)
sc123
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

Decision Feedback Equalizer- Stability analysis
Jul 29th, 2006, 9:48am
 
I am implementing a decision feedback equalizer in CMOS. For high speed implmentation most DFE topologies I have found use clocked decision and delay blocks (digital) and the ISI cancellation is done in current mode (analog) at the input of the decision slicer. So it is a mixed signal approach. The DFE forms a negative feedback loop as the data decision signals control NMOS current switches that make the correction at the input of the decision slicer. I am interested to know if any sort of conventional ac stability analysis is required for such a topology. None of the papers I have looked at go into the conventional phase margin type of stability analysis. Is that because the circuit is not operating in the small signal regime? The clocked slicer and delay blocks will be high gain. So employing a high gain path in a feedback loop brings up stability issues and maintaining a  closed loop phase margin less than 180 degrees is not feasible. However, transient simulations show good results and no signs of unstable behaviour ( undamped oscillations). What sort of stability analysis is required for a mixed signal DFE topology? Any thoughts or comments on this subject will be appreciated.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Decision Feedback Equalizer- Stability analysi
Reply #1 - Aug 3rd, 2006, 3:39pm
 
Stability in a DFE system is non-linear in nature. As well, it is a sampled time system, so a conventional linear systems feedback system model is not applicable.

As well, the feedback amplitude is fixed in nature (make a decision and feed it back) so a "gain/phase around the loop" does not apply.

What is the DFE getting used for? I spent 2 years doing these things for disk drives and they do not work reliably. When you start adding in noise, signal input amplitude variance, timing dispersion, etc, etc, to the input signal, the DFE architecture starts to have a lot of problems. When you get that down into a chip and add process variance onto all of the above, it totally falls apart.

The concept is simple, and the math model looks good, but when you add the details of real world signals, and semiconductor limitations, there are a lot of problems.

Jerry
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
sc123
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

Re: Decision Feedback Equalizer- Stability analysi
Reply #2 - Aug 4th, 2006, 5:47pm
 
Thanks Jerry. This confirmed what I had been thinking as well. I am looking at DFEs as part of my PhD research. DFEs are being looked at now to comabt ISI in multigigabit wired channels (backplanes, optical fiber). They were originally used in disk drives and now mixed signal topologies are being used to for high speed channel equalization. I can send you soem papers if you are interested.

Thanks, again

Soumya

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Decision Feedback Equalizer- Stability analysi
Reply #3 - Aug 5th, 2006, 1:23am
 
Lots and lots of academic papers got written on DFE for disk drives. To  the best of my knowledge not one of them ever made it into a commercial product. The did work in tape drives, but not disks.

I am also aware of about 8 million dollars burned on (industry) research there. Amazing waste of money.  :o

Backplane SerDes architectures? hmmmm, pre-emphais and post emphasis are needed if you are pushing the envelope, and I do know that DFE has worked there in papers published. If it is research, how about a pattern dependent pre-emphasis and a FFE Post emphasis architecture?

Other little nasty detail - model the backplane as a distributed, not a lumped, model. The responses are totally different and the distributed is more closely associated to reality.

Good luck with it!
Cheesy
Jerry
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.