The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 19th, 2024, 6:32am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Bandgap reference transient analysis (Read 6584 times)
chungmnig
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 37

Bandgap reference transient analysis
May 01st, 2007, 7:02pm
 
Hi ~~
I have a question about bandgap reference
Like attached picture
This is my transient analysis result (simulate vdd off and on conditions)
Why the bandgap voltage overshoot is so large?
(regardless there has start up circuit or not……)
My opamp is well designed.
(gain 80dB, phaseMargin 70, UGF 700kHz ,slew rate 0.8M V/s
and bandgap loop gain 80dB, loop phaseMargin 65, loop UGF 350KHz)

Thanks ~!!!!!
Back to top
 

264102162921517.PNG
View Profile   IP Logged
Visjnoe
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 233

Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #1 - May 1st, 2007, 11:43pm
 
Dear Chungmnig,

I think it is so big because of the top right capacitor...when VDD goes high/switches, you will basically see a spike which is determined by the ratio between this capacitor and the capacitor to ground. So basically, removing the top right capacitor (or changing this ratio) will seriously improve this issue.

As a side remark, I don't think that the voltage you are generating (VBG) is a bandgap voltage.

Regards

Peter
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
hspice
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 4

Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #2 - May 2nd, 2007, 3:36am
 
Agree with Peter. Also, you may let power ramp up other than step up. Such step up may make you missing potential start up problem.


Regards
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
RobG
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Bozeman, MT
Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #3 - May 3rd, 2007, 5:19pm
 
I can't think of any good reason to have a cap from Vdd to your output, but I don't think it is causing the overshoot.  

I think it is just the response time of the opamp...  Upon startup, the op-amp output will be forced to the bottom rail by the startup circuit.  That will pull your BG output to the top rail.  The opamp's bandwidth suggests response times on the order of uS, and that is what you are seeing.  

In addition, your particular compenstation scheme will cause overshoot in response to Vdd changes.  This isn't obvious, but consider this: Your opamp compensation is referred to the bottom rail.  If the top rail has a high-speed step, the gate-source voltage of your PMOS mirrors will change by the same amount (the compensation prevents the opamp from changing quickly), and you will see a big bump on VBG.  You would have to redesign the opamp to get around this (e.g. a folded cascode with compenstation from output to positive rail).  If you do this I think you will have better startup characteristics.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
anhnha
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6
Earth
Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #4 - Jun 9th, 2014, 11:51pm
 
Hi, could you tell me how to simulate loop gain for that bandgap?
I meant how you set up the testbench and how to simulate it in Cadence.
Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
cchen
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 8

Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #5 - Jun 12th, 2014, 2:51am
 
You may use stb analyis of spectre.

anhnha wrote on Jun 9th, 2014, 11:51pm:
Hi, could you tell me how to simulate loop gain for that bandgap?
I meant how you set up the testbench and how to simulate it in Cadence.
Thanks.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: Bandgap reference transient analysis
Reply #6 - Jun 12th, 2014, 7:30am
 
Hi chungmnig,

1.Try to keep decaps across Gate and source which eliminates any supply leakage through gm component.
2.Please re-design opamp with nmos input pair which reduce systematic offset and supply rejection.
3. In your case capacitor at the o/p and between vdd and o/p may act like a divider. Check the division ration. If there is no special reason please remove top cap.
4. Since you are changing Vdd from 3.3V to 0V, I don't think small signal stability will work perfectly here, I have seen some earlier some ckts showing good PM but they start oscillating after certain level of vdd step. Just to make sure there is no problem with stability change the vdd step to 100mV and see how things are going, if you still have the same problem then you have stability.
5. Please try to reduce rise and fall times of vdd switching, which may reduce un-necessary coupling.

Raj!!!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.