The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 17th, 2024, 4:27pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem (Read 8921 times)
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Jun 15th, 2007, 6:52am
 
Hi, all
I was simulated two second-order feedforward sigma delta modulators recently. the model shown in sdm_ff.jpg, the spectrum shown in fft_sdm_ff.jpg, the result is correct. When i add the input signal feedforward path to the quantizer shown in sdm_ffxin.jpg, the result can not display the second order noise shaping effect. But this structure can usually be seen in papers or other situations. But why the result is so unreasonable?? All comments are welcome. thanks in advance.
Back to top
 

sdm_ff.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #1 - Jun 15th, 2007, 6:55am
 
fft_sdm_ff.jpg
Back to top
 

fft_sdm_ff.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #2 - Jun 15th, 2007, 6:56am
 
sdm_ffxin.jpg
Back to top
 

sdm_ffxin.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #3 - Jun 15th, 2007, 6:57am
 
fft_sdm_ffxin.jpg
Back to top
 

fft_sdm_ffxin.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
email_gz
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 31
gaoz.mail@gmail.com
Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #4 - Jun 16th, 2007, 1:48am
 
1: Check if overload occur for 1/(1-Z)  which map to SW-OP output and comparator/AD ?
2: scaling you input signal to be a small range .
3: calculate you NTF ,  stability? find good scaling factors for both  in-band SNR requirment and  stability.
4: use multilevel comparator/AD.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile email_gz email_gz   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #5 - Jun 16th, 2007, 3:24am
 
hi, email_gz
    Thanks for your reply. The swing of two integrators are very small, this is the reason why i choose this architecture for saving of power consumption. The input to comparator is not large too.
    The STF and NTF i've caculated, no problems have found,  confusing!!depressed!!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
email_gz
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 31
gaoz.mail@gmail.com
Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #6 - Jun 16th, 2007, 11:34pm
 
If no overload occur ,  STF and NTF have not stability problem and also have resonable target in-band SNR, but then you get bad simulink result, maybe you should check your fft window function and more fft caculation points.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile email_gz email_gz   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #7 - Jun 17th, 2007, 9:12pm
 
The only difference between two models is whether the input signal participate in feedforward adding. After adding input signal's feedforward, the STF is changed to 1, but the feedback loop which deals with quantization noise is not changed, so the NTF is the same between two behavior models. The input signal's amplitude is not changed from two spectrum figure, but noise floor was go up. Could you simulate these two models if this won't take up you much time. thank you!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Berti
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 356

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #8 - Jun 17th, 2007, 11:07pm
 
Hi,

I think the coefficient of your direct-feed-forward path (according to your figure equals one)
is wrong. When multiplying the gains of the integrators I obtain 1/15. For a loop-gain of 1
your quantizer-gain should be 15. Well, the quantizer-gain of a single-bit quantizer isn't
defined. Nevertheless I think you have a coefficient of 1/15 for your direct feed-forward path.

And your are right, the additional path doesn't affect the NTF at all, and therefore also
the stability should be unchanged.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
caosl_zju
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 22

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #9 - Jun 19th, 2007, 5:05am
 
hi, Berti
    But why it works fine if i take the input signal feedforward path off ? Is it 1 bit quantizer's gain so important ?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Berti
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 356

Re: Feedforward Sigma-Delta Modulator problem
Reply #10 - Jun 20th, 2007, 12:25am
 
The quantizer gain has an influence on the transfer functions (NTF/STF).
Unfortunately, the gain of a 1bit quantizer isn't well defined. But usually
you derive you filter coefficients assuming that the quantizer gain is equal one.
After dynamic-range scaling you quantizer gain will probably change. In order
to have the proper STF (equals 1 in your case), the direct feed-forward path
times the quantizer gain should be one.
But I cannot predict from scratch how the loop stability is influenced in your case.
Of course, without the input signal feedforward you get a well designed feedforward
modulator, while with the input signal feedforward you STF with probably even amplify
the input signal.

I hope that helps, Regards.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.