vivkr
|
Hi Neo,
I think it is probably charge-injection and parasitic issues which are probably responsible in this case. If you look at Fig. 5 of this paper, you can see that the authors also use a dummy switch to prevent a jump in the common-mode level when going from track-to-hold phase. This switch is also useful in partially compensating for charge-injection.
There are of course other ways of designing a sample-and-hold for less power consumption, but for this case (6-bit flash), it was probably the best way to do it this way.
Be aware though that sometimes people may choose the cap size arbitrarily, and often the choice is 1 pF. Not in this case I think.
However, I disagree with loose-electron when he says that noise is the last consideration for cap sizing. If you are making high-resolution circuits, it is often the first one, but for low-res, it may be the last.
Regards Vivek
|