The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 20th, 2024, 12:37am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe positio (Read 4797 times)
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe positio
Aug 15th, 2007, 7:19am
 
Hi,

I am perplexed to find that the stability information (gain & phase margin) of my circuitry
are showing up differently depending on where I insert my probe element during the stb analysis
in Spectre.

The circuit is single-loop and I am using the loop-based algorithm, taking care to ensure that
the probe element selected is always in the loop. I use a 0V DC voltage source for the probe element.

Does anyone have any suggestion as to how I can avoid this problem?

Regards
Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 751

Re: stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe pos
Reply #1 - Aug 18th, 2007, 3:30pm
 
Vivek,

  How does the loop behave when using the current probe? Can
you publish the schematic so we can look at the circuit? Also have
you tried other methods for analyzing the stability, for example,
the two-port method, see "The Designers Guide to SPICE and
SPECTRE"? Sometimes, separating the forward and reverse
characteristics can provide clues about what the issue might be.

                                                              Best Regards,

                                                                    Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe pos
Reply #2 - Aug 20th, 2007, 12:02am
 
Hi Sheldon,

Thanks for the tips. Let me try these different methods. Unfortunately, I cannot post the schematic.
It is just a simple two-stage amplifier, where the compensation is at the output (output load >>>> any possible on-chip cap
by about 4-5 orders of magnitude). The first stage is a simple diff. gain stage, the feedback path has an R-divider.
I was experimenting with an additional level shifting stage between the first and the second stages.

There are several capacitive paths which might act as parallel paths at high-f, such as gate cap etc. So, I placed the probe
where I was sure that there were no signal paths in parallel to it.

The only possible reason I see is that the supply is not ideal (source impedance of ~ 2 Ohms), but I would not have expected
the kind of variation that I saw just because of this (~ 5 degree variation in PM).

But let me check the methods you describe.

Regards
Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 751

Re: stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe pos
Reply #3 - Aug 20th, 2007, 7:25pm
 
Vivek,

  Is it possible that the power supply resistance is introducing an additional
feedback loop? I have seen power supply resistance, extracted-R, act as a
feedback loop around two stage amplifiers.

                                                                              Best Regards,

                                                                                 Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: stb analysis in Spectre sensitive to probe pos
Reply #4 - Aug 22nd, 2007, 7:22am
 
Hi Sheldon,

I am quite sure that the supply forms a second loop. The only problem I had was that I did not expect the amount of variation I got.
I was expecting more like 1-2 degrees change in phase margin, not in the range of 5-10. Perhaps my assumptions were incorrect then.

Anyway, I did AC and TRAN analyses to conclude that I had enough stability margin. In any case, STB analysis also gave me large enough
margin, even if the exact value was dependent on the probe location.

Thanks for your suggestions.

Regards
Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.