The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 5th, 2024, 6:13am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
iip2 of mixer (Read 4001 times)
m
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

iip2 of mixer
Sep 14th, 2007, 10:15am
 
Hi
I am running mixer iip2 simulation with qpss. What is the maxharms of large signal(Lo) and small signal(two rf in) I should use?

I tried 1, 5, 10 for large signal and 1,2,3 for small signal, The difference of iip2 can be 40dB. More harmonics, the better iip2. I need at least 10 harmonics for large signal and 2 for small signals.

To my understanding, 1 for large signal and 1 for two small signals is good enough. Only noise simulation needs more harmonics for noise folding. How does the harmonics number influence the accuracy?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 751

Re: iip2 of mixer
Reply #1 - Sep 16th, 2007, 9:54pm
 
Karen,

 Don't think that one tone of the LO or RF inputs is sufficient for simulating
the IIP2 of a stage. There are no simple rules for the number of tones to
use. If you run a transient and plot the LO signal does it look like the LO
signal plotted when from QPSS analysis? To accurately capture the non-
ideality of the LO may require many tones and using 10 tones is not an
unreasonable number of tones to use.

Other questions:
1) Are you relying on device matching to improve the IIP2, that is, canceling
   the even distortion with differential circuits?

  In this case you will need to model the effect of mismatch, that is, perform
  Monte Carlo simulation

2) Have you tried using perturbation analysis to estimate the IIP2?

                                                              Best Regards,

                                                                Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
m
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: iip2 of mixer
Reply #2 - Sep 17th, 2007, 3:54pm
 
Hi,Sheldon,
Thanks. I still don't understand how many harmonics should I use for two small input signals, I think 1 for each should be enough. What is your opinion?

2)I want to make sure the number of harmonics are chosen rightly, then I'll go to monte carlo.

2) what is the proposal to use perturbation analysis?

regards
keren Smiley
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
simon2
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 27
Southampton, United Kingdom.
Re: iip2 of mixer
Reply #3 - Sep 23rd, 2007, 12:49pm
 
Hi karen,
             maybe I missed the point of your question, but should you not be thinking about a taylor series description of the signal waveform?

that is: the coefficents for each term f1+f2, f1-f2, 2f1+f2, f1+2f2 etc?

- therefore if your circuit becomes more non-linear under large signal conditions, you should be considering more terms according to how large each term is?

Cheers,
           SimonH.
Back to top
 
 

Simon.Harpham@ieee.org
http://www.SiliconDevices.com
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.