The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 20th, 2024, 7:17am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
PLL vs. DLL for Clock Generation? (Read 132 times)
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
PLL vs. DLL for Clock Generation?
Dec 05th, 2008, 2:02pm
 
Having done a lot of PLL designs, I tend to stick with PLL's to do timing generation (frequency multiplication, sub dividing a clocking signal etc.) However - from everyone's experience, what are the pro/con of using a DLL vs. PLL in these applications?

Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: PLL vs. DLL for Clock Generation?
Reply #1 - Dec 15th, 2008, 10:09am
 
Still interested in this topic. Anybody done both?
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
rf-design
Senior Member
****
Offline

Reiner Franke

Posts: 165
Germany
Re: PLL vs. DLL for Clock Generation?
Reply #2 - Dec 15th, 2008, 2:33pm
 
You need some thrown arguments.

Relative frequency range
Inductor allowed
Settling time
Special analog devices avaible
Tight subphases needed
Jitter or phase noise requierment
Supply rejection
Area
Design time
Risk versus $M mask cost
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: PLL vs. DLL for Clock Generation?
Reply #3 - Dec 17th, 2008, 2:58pm
 
For timing acquisition in a clock and data recovery system, not a mixer, so we are talking ring oscillators here, not LC-VCO's.

No inductors, and generic CMOS processes, underneath 5GHz.


rf-design wrote on Dec 15th, 2008, 2:33pm:
You need some thrown arguments.

Relative frequency range
Inductor allowed
Settling time
Special analog devices avaible
Tight subphases needed
Jitter or phase noise requierment
Supply rejection
Area
Design time
Risk versus $M mask cost

Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.