The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Aug 16th, 2024, 8:12am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Matching derating factor bad layout (Read 3281 times)
Visjnoe
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 233

Matching derating factor bad layout
Feb 24th, 2009, 11:08am
 
Dear all,

For the layout of an analog circuit there are some well-known best practices.
But what happens when you don't follow these guidelines? Can you assess this
qualitatively and if so, how?

As an example, consider a current mirror where the device sizing is OK with regard
to random mismatch/systematic mismatch.

How much would the matching be derated if one would not place these transistors close together? Or make their orientation perpendicular? Etc.
Any way to put a number on that (derating factor)?

Kind Regards

Peter
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: Matching derating factor bad layout
Reply #1 - Feb 25th, 2009, 12:16am
 
Hi Peter,

I don't believe that you can put a generic derating factor in such a case. This will likely be extremely sensitive to the processing conditions. You will probably not see a consistent derating factor even if you make a testchip.

In any case, it is often possible to follow best-practices with a minimal effort even without using common centroid and dummies.

Regards,

Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Berti
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 356

Re: Matching derating factor bad layout
Reply #2 - Feb 25th, 2009, 2:16am
 
Peter,

I think you should distinguish between local and distance mismatch. Unfortunatly, distance mismatch is typically not characterized in the DRM and there is also only very little literature available. However, you can try to find a publication which gives number for distance mismatch for a similar technology and compare it to the local mismatch data you have from your fab.

But when you have small (especially minimum length) devices, I think that the benefit of common centroid is only limited. Dummies on the other hand I think are important due to well-proximity effects, STI etc.

Cheers
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Visjnoe
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 233

Re: Matching derating factor bad layout
Reply #3 - Feb 26th, 2009, 3:21am
 
Thanks for your answers.
There are indeed not much papers on the subject.
Probably, if you take care of the sizing and DC biasing, you cannot deteriorate the matching that much by bad layout practice... unless you are aiming for 10b-12b performance.

Regards

Peter
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Berti
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 356

Re: Matching derating factor bad layout
Reply #4 - Feb 26th, 2009, 4:31am
 
Probably you CAN derate the matching by bad layout - but I expect that techniques like interdigitized-structures and common-centroid won't bring much improvement unless you have very large devices.

Cheers
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
superken
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Milpitas, CA
Re: Matching derating factor bad layout
Reply #5 - Feb 26th, 2009, 10:01am
 
I think if you look at foundry matching data such as those from TSMC, they characterize matching of the devices based on large distance, different orientations and without dummies.  That's the raw matching you're going to get, and any matching improvement efforts through good layout practice could only help. By how much? is still debatable and as long as you follow the correct biasing and sizing, the mismatch deviation won't be that substantial unless you are shooting for 8b or higher matching.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.