The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 20th, 2024, 4:31pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
a confusion about noise summary (Read 5143 times)
subgold
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 97

a confusion about noise summary
Sep 11th, 2009, 1:29am
 
hi all,

i have a confusion about noise summary of spectre.

i have an opamp used in a closed-loop. when i change the feedback factor (the system is still absolutely stable), and resize some transistors (only in the output stage), the noise at the output node has increased (the white noise).

the noise summary shows that, now some current sources in the bias network become the main noise contributors, whose white noise has increased significantly. (before the change, the main noise contributors are the input transistor, which is as expected)

to me this noise summary is really confusing and should not be the case, because i checked the dc operating point of those transistors, and they remain exactly the same. (of course they should remain same because they are just in the bias network). also, this shouldn't have something to do with the change of the system bandwidth, because i only check the spot white noise at one certain frequency.

so ultimately what does this noise summary tell me? how can i reduce the noise then?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #1 - Sep 11th, 2009, 7:28am
 
A noise contribution is the product of two numbers, the noise produced by the device, and the gain from that device to the output. Could the latter portion of this product have increased as a result of your changes to the circuit?

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #2 - Sep 11th, 2009, 8:11am
 
In pnoise analysis, one can separate noise into sources and transfer functions by setting the parameter separatenoise=yes. Unfortunately, a similar parameter does not seem to exist for noise analysis.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
subgold
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 97

Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #3 - Sep 11th, 2009, 8:36am
 
hi ken and frank, thank both of you for the reply.

i thought about the change of the gain/transfer function, but i just don't understand why.

for example, the noise increase appears mainly on transistors M1, M2, M3 (pls see the attachment.) imho, no matter how the transfer function looks, these three transistors should always have minor contribution to the output noise, and are never the biggest noise contributor, aren't they?
Back to top
 

foldcas.JPG
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #4 - Sep 12th, 2009, 7:06am
 
hi,
 1.To reduce noise from bias circuit  use less mirroring ratio (even though it increase's power dissipation it really helps some times)
2. I didn't understand why M1,2,3 don't contribute noise because their noise is directly dummped into signal path transistors

Could you please share you W/L ratio's of transistors.

Thanks,
rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
subgold
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 97

Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #5 - Sep 14th, 2009, 1:17am
 
raja.cedt wrote on Sep 12th, 2009, 7:06am:
hi,
 1.To reduce noise from bias circuit  use less mirroring ratio (even though it increase's power dissipation it really helps some times)
2. I didn't understand why M1,2,3 don't contribute noise because their noise is directly dummped into signal path transistors

Could you please share you W/L ratio's of transistors.

Thanks,
rajasekhar.


hi

1. the mirror ratio is only one. the W/L is 10/30um.
2. i know these transistors contribute noise. what i meant was, they shouldn't be the biggest noise contributor of the this circuit, and dominate the total noise.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: a confusion about noise summary
Reply #6 - Sep 14th, 2009, 1:30am
 
hi,
  still i didn't understand why they are contributing...ok let me give last trail could you please increase their overdrive and check..if entire noise decreases means there are some nodes which are low impedance nodes. Then find Signal path node impedance and try to increase

Thanks,
Rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.