The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 12:35am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
CMOS LC tank with vs without current source (Read 4198 times)
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Apr 20th, 2010, 10:57pm
 
typical cmos LC tank (pmos + nmos cross coupled) can oscillate well without current source at the bottom or at the top, the output swing can reach rail2rail without problem.

I just wonder why some designs, current source is added at the bottom, making it current limiting. Besides this, it needs a ac bypass cap for ac ground.

The only reason i could think of is to make it insensitive to vdd since current is defined?

thank you.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
rfcooltools.com
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 159

Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #1 - Apr 22nd, 2010, 11:36am
 
Typically the use of the PMOS and NMOS both (Complimentary Gm) can be the most efficient power, but up to a point.  The limit is that the tank has a smaller voltage limit due to a dual constraint of PMOS in the up direction and NMOS in the down direction, with  that the best phase noise is more limited than say a PMOS or NMOS only.  When a NMOS or PMOS only design is made the Tank is usually connected to the supply or ground thus the VCO amplitude on the Tank can be twice or more of the since it can swing above supply or below ground in the PMOS case.  But as a result the dBcPnoise/IC efficiency.  

Note using a tank to ground as in the PMOS gm case can cause the parasitic diodes to turn on momontarrily and this can cause some problems, which may not be modelled properly.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
love_analog
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 101

Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #2 - Apr 22nd, 2010, 4:17pm
 
If there is no current source the tank Q is degraded. With a current source, you will mantain the tank Q

That is why you will see that people will put a inductor in series with the current source (if the current source was shunted by a cap to reduce the downconverted 2*fref noise)
Back to top
 
 

loveanalog.blogspot.com
The Power of Analog
View Profile   IP Logged
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #3 - Apr 28th, 2010, 6:12am
 
thanks for your replies.

Quote:
If there is no current source the tank Q is degraded. With a current source, you will mantain the tank Q


i think the above reply is refering to pmos/nmos only LC tank right?
How about CMOS LC tank case? does it need current source too?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
love_analog
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 101

Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #4 - May 1st, 2010, 8:42am
 
This is independent of cmos or nmos/pmos. You could make a cmos without current source and leave with the Q degradation. Your choice. Simulate it.
Back to top
 
 

loveanalog.blogspot.com
The Power of Analog
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #5 - May 4th, 2010, 7:35am
 
hi casual
           i think with out current source you will get very good phase noise due no 2*fo up conversion as well as more swing. Coming to supply noise if you put good supply regulator probably you would end up with less phase noise with less power.

Thanks,
Rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

Re: CMOS LC tank with vs without current source
Reply #6 - May 19th, 2010, 12:11am
 
The Q will degrade without current source?
I do not see any degradation on Q since Q is fixed by the inductor and other parasitic components.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.