The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 3:30pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
tuning range LC QVCO (Read 7697 times)
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

tuning range LC QVCO
Jun 29th, 2010, 6:26am
 
I tried to increase the current of LC QVCO tank to increase the output amplitude that drives buffers.
I found  the tuning range looks odd. Near to the output common-mode (around 1.3-1.4V) it starts to have a dip & hump.  The lower range is saturated.  If I reduce back to the current, it looks ok and have wider tuning range.
Back to top
 

tuningrange.png
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #1 - Jul 3rd, 2010, 8:17pm
 
hi,
hi,
  why tuning curve is non-monotonic? have you checked wehter spice is converged or not? just run with a sigle control voltage for both current. you should get bit lower frequency. If posible check how varactor is changing with voltage because at output common mode varactor voltage is zero, so check there....
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
wave
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 117
Silicon Valley
Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #2 - Jul 4th, 2010, 1:29am
 
looks like you are not sweeping the control voltage in fine enough increments.  That's why it appears non-monotonic.  Add more points and it will smooth out --- and then probably tell you it's still non-monotonic due to a model or change in region of operation.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #3 - Jul 5th, 2010, 2:20am
 
it is not the matter of resolution step (checked)
The cap vs vctrl curve is smooth.

I doubt it is because of the injected power from quadrature vco.
It might due to the Q factor of the varactor.  The Q is the lowest at common-mode.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Mayank
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 334

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #4 - Jul 6th, 2010, 6:51am
 
hmm.....interesting.

Does the Q of the varactor show a Dip at CM voltage ???
If possible, pls. post the graph of Qvaractor vs. Input Current.

if it were the case, then i doubt it would show the effect you originally quoted. Quote:
If I reduce back to the current, it looks ok and have wider tuning range.
It should have shown same behaviour approaching from both sides.

Have you checked Raja's point whether simulator converged properly at those spiky points ?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #5 - Jul 6th, 2010, 8:04am
 
hi,
  as mayank said please check Q vs control voltage, because all our analysis depends on based assumption that varactor Q is constant. And also if possible publish inductor Q

Thanks,
Rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
vp1953
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 172

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #6 - Jul 6th, 2010, 10:15am
 
How does the voltage amplitude vary with frequency (does it for instance peak around where you see the kink in the resonant frequency curve) - can you post a picture of that?

I also seem to recall that with cadence, using the low accuracy presets does funny stuff like this - try running a simulation with the conservative setting.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
rfcooltools.com
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 159

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #7 - Jul 6th, 2010, 10:10pm
 
are you using parasitic RLC extraction? check the varactor dc node to see if a  resonance  grows there in the range you suspect.  

http://rfcooltools.com
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #8 - Jul 7th, 2010, 12:23am
 
it was prelayout sim

it is not due to accuracy setting.

Highly suspect on the Q of the nmosvar.
However I could not simulate Q nmosvar because it gave me bogus results!

see thread
http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1274702712/4#4

The Q normally is the lowest at common-mode and the weird behavior always happens near to the common-mode.

I have reduced the length of nmosvar, everything looks fine.
In the previous setting, the length is about 3x of min to increase tuning range.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #9 - Jul 8th, 2010, 11:41pm
 
casual..whats the reason finally? how did you solved that.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
supermoment
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 167

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #10 - Jul 10th, 2010, 11:53pm
 
found that the Q of the cap array is pretty small after knowing how to extract Q using ac method rather than sp analysis.

improve the Q of the mim cap array . Just wonder why the Q is pretty small in 5GHz. How could it work in >10GHz application?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aLittleKnowledge
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 8

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #11 - Jul 13th, 2010, 4:28am
 
Variable capacitor Q can be quite dependent on bias.  I would look at avoiding bias conditions where the Q becomes small.  That might mean using a larger area device.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
love_analog
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 101

Re: tuning range LC QVCO
Reply #12 - Jul 29th, 2010, 6:23am
 
I don't think Q can cause f-v curve non-monotonicity. Q can cause amplitude change whcih could cause a change in f, but thats usually not a very big effect.
Back to top
 
 

loveanalog.blogspot.com
The Power of Analog
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.