The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 3:24pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Minimum lenght of RF device (Read 3359 times)
unevb
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 18

Minimum lenght of RF device
Aug 22nd, 2010, 12:22pm
 
Hi,

i) Is it possible for the k-factor of a amplifier to be less than 1 at a frequency at which Gt < 0dB ? I am seeing this result in simulation. Also, since gain is <0dB , is it possible for the system to be unstable?I expect the k-factor of a tuned circuit to have a shape like a parabola, with the minima being at the tuned frequecy. I have attached the plots.

ii) Why is it that the RF model of the transistor has a minimum length constraint greater than the minimum length allowed by the technology. I am using a foundry pdk for a 90nm process, but it allows a min length of 240nm on the rf models. Does this have something to do with the optimal layout of the RF transistor for performance?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
unevb
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 18

Re: Minimum lenght of RF device
Reply #1 - Aug 22nd, 2010, 12:24pm
 
Attaching the plot
Back to top
 

kf.PNG
View Profile   IP Logged
vp1953
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 172

Re: Minimum lenght of RF device
Reply #2 - Aug 23rd, 2010, 5:02pm
 
It is not unusual for the RF devices to have a min geometry greater than the minimum required for the process. They usually have guard rings around them so that the environment around the RF transistor is similar where it is used; it is related to being able to characterize the device consistently across all process corners and temperature.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Minimum lenght of RF device
Reply #3 - Aug 24th, 2010, 6:10am
 
Hi,


for question 1, from my understanding, the k-factor is used to represent unconditional stability. For a given port impedance, it does not necessarily mean that the circuit is unstable, it just means that there is some value of the port impedance which causes the circuit to be unstable. On the other hand, GT is the transducer power gain at the specific port impedance which is defined in the testbench. So perhaps the circuit is unstable at a port impedance where GT is more than 1.

Let me say however, that i'm not sure whether or not a circuit can be unstable (or not) when GT<1. It doesn't sound impossible though.

For question 2, I haven't seen that many technologies, but for the ones I have seen, there is not such a huge discrepancy between the minimum device length and that for RF transistors. Perhaps you are not looking at the right transistor.


cheers,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
purplewolf
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 103

Re: Minimum lenght of RF device
Reply #4 - Aug 24th, 2010, 8:06am
 
unevb wrote on Aug 22nd, 2010, 12:22pm:
Hi,

i) Is it possible for the k-factor of a amplifier to be less than 1 at a frequency at which Gt < 0dB ? I am seeing this result in simulation. Also, since gain is <0dB , is it possible for the system to be unstable?I expect the k-factor of a tuned circuit to have a shape like a parabola, with the minima being at the tuned frequecy. I have attached the plots.

ii) Why is it that the RF model of the transistor has a minimum length constraint greater than the minimum length allowed by the technology. I am using a foundry pdk for a 90nm process, but it allows a min length of 240nm on the rf models. Does this have something to do with the optimal layout of the RF transistor for performance?


You should care about the k-factor upto to the freq to which device has power gain..when device has no gain it is acting just as a "passive" element..and passive elements have no stability issues.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
purplewolf
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 103

Re: Minimum lenght of RF device
Reply #5 - Aug 24th, 2010, 3:26pm
 
W/L is proportional to gm..keep L min for maximum gm...
yes .. probably it has something to do with optimum layout or so..
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.