Designer’s Guide Community

extremis Junior Member Offline Posts: 10	Folded cascode compensation Feb 17^th, 2011, 9:02am What is the best way to compensate the folded cascode? I am getting very low phase margin, or even negative.
Back to top	cfc.jpg IP Logged

Rakesh

Community Member

Offline

Posts: 60

Re: Folded cascode compensation
Reply #1 - Feb 17^th, 2011, 9:13am

Usually folded cascode is not compensated as the second dominant (at the folding node ) comes at higher frequency. May be in your design you would have choosen the sizes of the transistors at folding node big. Or increase the gm of the cascode transistor at the folding node.
If this doesnot work out connect a RC between the folding node and ground. This will introduce a zero so that your phase margin will be good..
Is this fine

Back to top

IP Logged

wave

Senior Member

Offline

Posts: 117
Silicon Valley

Re: Folded cascode compensation
Reply #2 - Feb 17^th, 2011, 11:49am

I agree with the previous post. �Ignoring parasitics, a folded cascode is a one pole system.

You do not show the output Cload nor the way you are simulating stability.

Also, I'd look hard at your biasing. �
The P7-N4 leg gives me a headache staring at it.
Specifically, the cascode gates are biased by the signal point of opposite polarity. �Check your PSRR.

Good luck,
WAVE � Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

subgold

Community Member

Offline

Posts: 97

Re: Folded cascode compensation
Reply #3 - Feb 18^th, 2011, 1:11am

i am afraid your folded branch has way too little current compared with that of the main input pair, which means your parasitic nondominant poles are quite close to the dominant pole. that results in the small phase margin.

i guess you will also face a transient problem as you dont have enough sourcing current to the load. if u meant to design a rail-to-rail input, then the current summation in the folded branch is likely wrongly constructed.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lex Senior Member Offline Posts: 201 Eindhoven, Holland	Re: Folded cascode compensation Reply #4 - Feb 18^th, 2011, 1:26am I think your bias circuit needs an overhaul.
Back to top	IP Logged

extremis Junior Member Offline Posts: 10	Re: Folded cascode compensation Reply #5 - Feb 18^th, 2011, 3:18am The folded branch has so little current in order to increase the gain (>80dB). The OPAMP should have PM>50 without any load. Maybe i should add a common source stage with Miller compensation.
Back to top	IP Logged

sheldon

Community Fellow

Offline

Posts: 751

Re: Folded cascode compensation
Reply #6 - Feb 18^th, 2011, 6:00am

Extremis,

1) The input stage is not biased properly

�Starting at the beginning, the current �mirror ratio for N11-N7
is 10uA:320nA. The issue appears that the n-channel input diff
pair includes 2 Vt drops (1V+0.5V) from the source follower
and the input device. So the n-channel current source is not
in saturation, Vds=310uV. Compare the n-channel input bias
current to the p-channel input bias current, 320nA:160uA. �

You may want to either re-consider the source follower or use
larger devices, less gate overdrive, on a 3V supply you cannot
afford Vgs of 1V (N10, N12) for the source follower.

2) You need a folded cascode

� You chose to implement a rail to rail input stage, n-channel
and p-channel connected in parallel. This approach conflicts
with the gain portion of the design. That is, you have a single-
ended output so you need to have a current mirror as the load.
Yet you are trying to fold using p-channel/n-channel mirrors.
This won't work. Folding stages are differential.

Or you have stacked two mirrors, one n-channel and one p-channel,
then driven the mirrors differentially. This is not a folded cascode.

Some options:
1) Give up on the cascode
� �Throw away the current of N6 and P1, short them to the
� �supplies and connect the mirrors as cascoded mirrors.
2) Implement a real cascode
� �Delete the n-channel input and follower, create an actual
� �folding stage with the channels: N0, N1, N3, N4.

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Best Regards,

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Sheldon � �

Back to top

IP Logged

RobG Community Fellow Offline Posts: 569 Bozeman, MT	Re: Folded cascode compensation Reply #7 - Feb 22^nd, 2011, 11:50am In addition, the N-Channel Diff pair is also not cascoded to it probably kills your DC gain, although since it has no current in it maybe it won't... on the other hand, the low current will set up a pole...
Back to top	IP Logged

Nandish Mehta

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 22

Re: Folded cascode compensation
Reply #8 - Feb 22^nd, 2011, 9:11pm

Adding further, as the low current in the NMOS & PMOS sources at the folding node will also limit the amount of input swing that you can support.

This is because the differential input multiplied by input gm is the current swing that is required to be supported before the active loads go out of the current.

In other words you are achieving >80 db gain because there is no current in the active loads so effective gds is very high.

Regards
Nandish

Back to top

IP Logged