Designer’s Guide Community

jefkat Community Member Offline Posts: 69	Code Dependent kick on Ladder Dec 14^th, 2011, 12:54pm Hi folks, Is there a clever way to minimize the code dependent kick on the ladder. I have a differential signal and I need to quantize it at 5 bit resolution and at 8MHz. I can not spend much current . So any hints, references etc , most welcome.. Thanks shaf
Back to top	IP Logged

raja.cedt Senior Fellow Offline Posts: 1516 Germany	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #1 - Dec 14^th, 2011, 12:56pm hello, could be please elaborate more, what do you mean by ladder. Thanks, raj.
Back to top	IP Logged

jefkat Community Member Offline Posts: 69	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #2 - Dec 14^th, 2011, 11:03pm Resistive Ladder I meant.
Back to top	IP Logged

raja.cedt

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1516
Germany

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #3 - Dec 15^th, 2011, 1:31am

hello,

I understand now, you are talking about flash ADC reference disturbance because of comparators switching. So better make reference less sensitive to sudden change other make coupling less to reference. Use per-amplifier at the comparator input otherwise use good DE-coupling cap at each tap of the resistive divider (this is called bowing ).

Thanks,
Raj.

Back to top

IP Logged

jefkat

Community Member

Offline

Posts: 69

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #4 - Dec 15^th, 2011, 9:24am

Thanks Raja for the comments. Using pre-amplifiers is out of question as I have no current left . Not so sure about using decoupling caps. Decoupling caps will slow the ladder down further.

raja.cedt wrote on Dec 15^th, 2011, 1:31am:

hello,

I understand now, you are talking about flash ADC reference disturbance �because of comparators switching. So better make reference less sensitive to sudden change other make coupling less to reference. Use per-amplifier at the comparator input otherwise use good DE-coupling cap at each tap of the resistive divider (this is called bowing ).

Thanks,
Raj.

Back to top

IP Logged

raja.cedt Senior Fellow Offline Posts: 1516 Germany	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #5 - Dec 15^th, 2011, 10:36am hello, you are wrong, decoupling caps doesn't slow down your ckt's. It is just bias ckts for comparator. This is very imp when you have switch cap comparator. Any how thing about resistors-string bowing Thanks, Raj.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sanjay Rajasekhar

New Member

Offline

Posts: 7

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #6 - Dec 16^th, 2011, 1:41am

There is probably a nicer way to deal with this. If you have a good parasitic extractor, you could probably do some simulations with parasitics to check the strength of the kickback. Once you have a fairly good idea, you could choose a cap value which when used between the output of the comparator and the ladder tap point would result in the same strength of kickback. Now all you have to do is to connect one end of this cap to the ladder tap point, and the other end to the inverted comparator output. So when the comparator is pushing some charge onto the ladder, now there is this new cap which is absorbing it, leaving the ladder tap point voltage largely unchanged. I'm pretty sure that this cap value wont be very high.

However beware of creating inadvertent negative feedback paths which could result in multiple triggers on your comparators.

Regards,
Sanjay

Back to top

IP Logged

RobG

Community Fellow

Offline

Posts: 570
Bozeman, MT

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #7 - Dec 16^th, 2011, 8:13am

jefkat wrote on Dec 15^th, 2011, 9:24am:

Thanks Raja for the comments. Using pre-amplifiers is out of question as I have no current left . Not so sure about using decoupling caps. Decoupling caps will slow the ladder down further.

It is a power/speed/accuracy trade-off. The caps will reduce the glitch size, but the smaller glitches will take longer to settle to zero. For example, increasing the filtering might take a 100mV glitch that takes 100nS to settle and change it into a 1mV glitch that takes 10uS to settle. If your error tolerance is much more than 1mV you don't care how long it takes to settle so using caps might make sense in that case.

The down side to filtering is that the taps will never settle to their exact value. You need to check the average current coming out of the taps and make sure the IR drop isn't too large.

Code dependent currents can cause problems, but I wouldn't think it would be a problem at 5 bits, 8MHz. Check your average current for different codes and see how it will affect the average voltage of the taps of your ladder.

Back to top

IP Logged

loose-electron Senior Fellow Offline Best Design Tool = Capable Designers Posts: 1638 San Diego California	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #8 - Dec 18^th, 2011, 2:25pm Consider a sample and hold circuit which is in "hold" mode while all the transient switching is going on.
Back to top	Jerry Twomey www.effectiveelectrons.com Read My Electronic Design Column Here Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical IP Logged

vivkr

Community Fellow

Offline

Posts: 780

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #9 - Dec 19^th, 2011, 5:37am

jefkat wrote on Dec 14^th, 2011, 12:54pm:

Hi folks,
� �Is there a clever way to minimize the code dependent kick on the ladder. I have a differential signal and I need to quantize it at 5 bit resolution and at 8MHz. I can not spend much current . So any hints, references etc , most welcome..
Thanks
shaf

Your signal is differential. Are you also using a differential threshold for the comparators? If not, then you should as you can cut down the effective impedance presented by the ladder to any differential kickback by a factor of 2. I have seen many people use a single-ended threshold where they take one end off the ladder and the other is grounded or tied to a common mode voltage.

Vivek

Back to top

IP Logged

raja.cedt

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1516
Germany

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #10 - Dec 19^th, 2011, 6:23am

hello vivek,
if you use pure differential reference then only differential impedance offered by ladder will be half, where as if you only single ended reference and and by applying one side reference and one side common mode voltage to comparator then i guess you don't see reduction in differential impedance, am i correct? correct me if am wrong.

Thanks,
Raj.

Back to top

IP Logged

loose-electron Senior Fellow Offline Best Design Tool = Capable Designers Posts: 1638 San Diego California	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #11 - Dec 21^st, 2011, 10:59am OH, this is on the bias reference chain to a flash ADC? 1. Resistance in series with the comparator input that connects to the bias reference chain. 2. If needed, filter capacitors on each end of that resistor. the Pi section RC filter created is a LPF in both directions try it, you will like it! :)
Back to top	Jerry Twomey www.effectiveelectrons.com Read My Electronic Design Column Here Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical IP Logged

weber8722

Community Member

Offline

Posts: 95

Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder
Reply #12 - Jan 2^nd, 2012, 1:49am

jefkat wrote on Dec 14^th, 2011, 12:54pm:

Hi folks,
� �Is there a clever way to minimize the code dependent kick on the ladder. I have a differential signal and I need to quantize it at 5 bit resolution and at 8MHz. I can not spend much current . So any hints, references etc , most welcome..
Thanks
shaf

Hi,

beside adding caps to the reference ladder (which is usually very good). Another good way might be to use a comparator with kick-back cancellation capacitance :). This would have a similar effect than a pre-amp, but without more current. Usually dummy mosfets are inserted in cross-coupled manner. This way the charge injection to ref ladder is canceled (at least to e.g. 90%). The slow-down of the comp should be small (like 15%).

Bye Stephan

Back to top

IP Logged

raja.cedt Senior Fellow Offline Posts: 1516 Germany	Re: Code Dependent kick on Ladder Reply #13 - Jan 2^nd, 2012, 4:57am hello, do you mean neutralization capacitors? Thanks, Raj.
Back to top	IP Logged