The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 9th, 2024, 3:15am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation (Read 1172 times)
hacksgen
Ex Member




Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Jan 09th, 2012, 1:45am
 
Hello Everyone,

This is for those members who have done both simulation and measurement from chip.

I have a question regarding output resistance of certain building blocks like opamps, OTA's etc.. Normally the output resistance is constant for the block from DC till certain frequency after which the parasitic capacitances in the transistor make the output resistance to fall down at higher frequencies.

Based on your experiences, can anyone tell me how close the simulated and measured values are for a advanced technology node such as UMC or TSMC 90nm/130nm. I understand that mismatch and other effects will be present. However I am only looking for a rough value or maximum percentage difference between the two.

I have not done a tapeout myself so I dont know how much I can trust the values given by the simulation.

Thanks for your help.


Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #1 - Jan 9th, 2012, 2:05am
 
hello,
i didn't understand your Question, how close depends on the how better are the models and how good parasitic extraction. I haven't measured op amp o/p resistance but i have done for high speed driver. For this blocks simulated o/p impedance  (a k a return loss)and measured will match around 2dB.

Thanks,
Raj.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
hacksgen
Ex Member




Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #2 - Jan 9th, 2012, 2:56am
 
Hi raj,

Lets consider the TSMC or UMC 90 nm process. Based on this assumption if I design an OTA with a certain output impedence and send it to tapeout and finally measure it, than my question is how much of a variation can I expect between the simulated and measured output impedence. 5% 10%, 20% . I know that no exact value can be given but I would like to know none the less whats the maximum variation I can expect.

As you said this is also closely related to how good the models are. I have no clue about how the models are compared to actual measured values which is why I ask here if anyone who has used such a process can enlighten me about the maximum variation I can expect.

Thanks again
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #3 - Jan 9th, 2012, 3:21am
 
hello,
i donno about UMC, but tsmc 90nm is well matured process, so you can get very close to the simulated value. But remember when you add pad to the opamp it will be loaded, so accuracy depends on the kind of DE-embedding you are using.

May be some can explain better. Most of the people measured the gain rather o/p impedance.

Thanks,
Raj
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
HdrChopper
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 493

Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #4 - Jan 9th, 2012, 7:41am
 
hacksgen wrote on Jan 9th, 2012, 1:45am:
Hello Everyone,

I have a question regarding output resistance of certain building blocks like opamps, OTA's etc.. Normally the output resistance is constant for the block from DC till certain frequency after which the parasitic capacitances in the transistor make the output resistance to fall down at higher frequencies.



Hi hacksgen,

If your building blocks are gonna be used in -ve fbk configuration (sampling voltage) then this statement is not true: as loop gain decreases, above dominant pole freq, the output impedance will start increasing (from a very low value at low frequencies). This impedance will increase until closed loop -3dB freq is reached, at which it will remain constant.
Finally at very high frequency the parasitics you are asking about is when they will start playing a role.

Best
Tosei
Back to top
 
 

Keep it simple
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #5 - Jan 9th, 2012, 8:05am
 
hello,
yes chooper is correct, it is very difficult to test op amp in open loop due to higher gain, one important point is from the closed loop o/p impedance and open loop gain we back annotate open loop o/p impedance.

Thanks,
Raj.  
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Simulated output resistance vs Measured Output Resistance Variation
Reply #6 - Jan 9th, 2012, 11:48am
 
Variance between simulation and silicon.

Start with the premise that the weak-strong model corners
already have a lot of variance.

Will you be inside those limits if you include
everything in the model?

Generally yes. Give the below a read, it should help
you set up your model properly.

http://electronicdesign.com/article/eda/simulation-vs-silicon-avoid-costly-mista...

Here's the original PDF (easier to read):
effectiveelectrons.com/whitepapers/simulationvssilicon.pdf


That might be useful background.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.