The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 5:17am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain? (Read 6790 times)
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Apr 08th, 2012, 7:52pm
 
Hi, guys

I'am very confused with the concept of peaking and overshoot.

Dose they descripe the same thing just in the different domain?

If not, is there any relationship between them?

Thanks a lot~~~
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #1 - Apr 9th, 2012, 1:23am
 
They are related through the circuit Q, or damping ratio.

regards,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #2 - Apr 9th, 2012, 3:29am
 
aaron_do wrote on Apr 9th, 2012, 1:23am:
They are related through the circuit Q, or damping ratio.

regards,
Aaron

I know that in a 2nd order system, there is a standard description about Q or damping ratio. How about higher order?

Recently, I have desgned a cascade AMP which is used in the open-loop condition. In the bode diagram, the plot(Mag V.S. Freq) is flat without peaking, while in the trans digram, the overshoot(ring) is series. Do you know how I can solve this problem?

Thank you so much~~~
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #3 - Apr 9th, 2012, 4:28am
 
post the schematic and plots...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #4 - Apr 9th, 2012, 1:49pm
 
aaron_do wrote on Apr 9th, 2012, 1:23am:
They are related through the circuit Q, or damping ratio.

regards,
Aaron

Sometime yes and sometimes no.

So - Not necessarily

Peaking can refer to just the spectral response and at a particular frequency

Ringing and damping can refer to either reactive ringing or control systems and their
zeta (phase margin ) response.

(Both have Q, but a feedback system is generally looked at differently than a RL inductive ringing.)

Math types will say that that one is the same, and I will 50% agree with that.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #5 - Apr 10th, 2012, 4:25am
 
raja.cedt wrote on Apr 9th, 2012, 4:28am:
post the schematic and plots...


This architecture is from one of papers I have read before,adding the interleaving active feedback make the whole system behaves equally as another topology in the next pic.
Back to top
 

ampcore.png
View Profile   IP Logged
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #6 - Apr 10th, 2012, 4:30am
 
Assuming that, every G(s) has the form of A/(1+sRC), and Gf(s)=B/(1+sRC); So the whole poles,totally 6 with 2 real and 2 pair of compex, is splitting.
Back to top
 

equamp.png
View Profile   IP Logged
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #7 - Apr 10th, 2012, 4:36am
 
The splitting bring a more flatten AC gain response.

I also find that one pair of the complex pole will have a high reactive part due to the splitting.  So I guess maybe this is the reason why it has a high overshoot.

Is this right?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #8 - Apr 10th, 2012, 5:24pm
 
You should be able to tell based on the Q of the complex poles.


Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
henrytqy
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 28

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #9 - Apr 11th, 2012, 6:32am
 
aaron_do wrote on Apr 10th, 2012, 5:24pm:
You should be able to tell based on the Q of the complex poles.


Aaron


Sorry, I don't understand your meaning. Do you mean that I should give out the Q of the pole?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: peaking in frequency V.S. overshoot in time domain?
Reply #10 - Apr 11th, 2012, 5:38pm
 
Hi,


Actually I haven't really read up on this in a long time, but just browsing through my book, "Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems", if you have a transfer function which can be written as,

H(s) = (s-a)(s-b)
        -----------
      (s-c)(s-d)(s-e)

you can do a partial fraction expansion to see the effect of each pole. Real poles result in no overshoot, but for complex poles, the amount of overshoot depends on the Q factor, or damping factor of the poles. It seems that you have the transfer function, so you should be able to tell if the overshoot is due to the complex poles just by looking at their Q factor...


regards,
Aaron


BTW, if you are injecting a large signal and looking at the overshoot, then the above explanation doesn't really apply since it is for a linear system.
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.