The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Aug 16th, 2024, 10:18am
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
stb and ac analysis do not match? (Read 3641 times)
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #15 - Nov 9th, 2012, 1:57am
 
The method that injects only a series ac voltage simulates what I like to call the "voltage loop gain". The conditions under which this is a good approximation for the "real" loop gain are given in http://www.omicron-lab.com/fileadmin/assets/customer_examples/Bode_Info_LoopGain....

I compare the results of the different loop gain simulation methods at the end of http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Design-Oriented_Analysis_D-OA/message/41. Additional information about loop gain simulation is available on my webpage https://sites.google.com/site/frankwiedmann/loopgain (where you can also find my definition of the Y parameters used in the comparison, see https://sites.google.com/site/frankwiedmann/loopgain#TOC-What-about-other-defini...).
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Nov 09th, 2012, 6:26am by Frank Wiedmann »  
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #16 - Nov 9th, 2012, 3:16am
 
Frank, thank you for clarification (and for the 1st referenced document, which I didn`t know yet).
Of course, I agree with everything and - if I understood you and the linked documents right - you are supporting my doubts regarding the strict and general statement that an "ac analysis approach should never be used" for loop gain determination, right?
Thank you.
B.
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #17 - Nov 9th, 2012, 4:32am
 
In my opinion, simulation of voltage loop gain can be adequate in many situations, but you should know what you are doing. The other methods presented on my webpage have the advantage that they always give the same result, no matter where in the loop you put the probe.

For Spectre users, I see no reason to use ac analysis to simulate voltage loop gain instead of using stb analysis (which corresponds to Tian's Method as described on my webpage), because the results of stb analysis are more accurate and it is at least as easy to set up as ac analysis.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #18 - Nov 9th, 2012, 4:57am
 
Fine - thank you.
Your statements - and , in particular, your sentence "...you should know what you are doing" - are in full agreement with my way of "engineering thinking".
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2386
Silicon Valley
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #19 - Nov 9th, 2012, 11:00pm
 
Buddypoor,
    I'm with you on the 'correct' method, but not on the 'exact enough'. In my experience attempting to open the loop always changes the loading effects, which changes the measured loop gain at the higher frequencies (near the unity gain frequency), making the results largely useless.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #20 - Nov 10th, 2012, 1:55am
 
Hi Ken,

I am afraid, I have expressed myself not clear enough.
I think the precondition "I should know what I am doing and why/if it is allowed to do" covers everything.
And - as I have said - I can accept an error if it "remains within the limits set by the aforementioned uncertainties (other error sources)."

To be specific, I am afraid that in many cases the error introduced by the two-pole opamp model (neglecting higher poles as well as parasitic influences) can be in the same order or even larger if compared with the error introduced by the voltage-loop gain method. But, of course, it depends on the particular case and cannot be generalized. Therefore, I have to know what I am doing....
B.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2012, 3:57am by buddypoor »  

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: stb and ac analysis do not match?
Reply #21 - Nov 10th, 2012, 4:23am
 
Ken Kundert wrote on Nov 9th, 2012, 11:00pm:
Buddypoor,
    I'm with you on the 'correct' method, but not on the 'exact enough'. In my experience attempting to open the loop always changes the loading effects, which changes the measured loop gain at the higher frequencies (near the unity gain frequency), making the results largely useless.

-Ken

The setup for voltage loop gain simulation does not open the loop. You put the ac voltage source in the same place where you put the loop gain probe for an stb analysis. I agree that opening the loop with large inductors and large capacitors is generally a bad idea.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.