The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 16th, 2024, 9:34pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Resonance load or (inter-stage) impedance matching for CMOS amplifiers (Read 3111 times)
vivarf
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 35

Resonance load or (inter-stage) impedance matching for CMOS amplifiers
Feb 17th, 2013, 5:52pm
 
Hi all,

Given a millimeter-wave multi-stage common source/cascode CMOS amplifier. Which method would be the proper design: inter-stage conjugate matching or resonance load (adjacent stage should be place close in the layout)?

For CMOS transistor, it is gate-source voltage controlled device, it is more important to provide high voltage (not power) to the gate. So if the adjacent stage is placed very close: resonance load is the proper way, thus complex inter-stage matching is relaxed, chip size is saved. However, in most of state of the arts literature I have reviewed, inter-state conjugate matching is often chosen. Why go through to much trouble with inter-stage matching design but simply resonance LC circuit?

Could anyone provide some idea? Thanks in advance.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile veeater   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Resonance load or (inter-stage) impedance matching for CMOS amplifiers
Reply #1 - Feb 17th, 2013, 9:58pm
 
Hi,


treating the MOSFET's input as purely capacitive is only really adequate at low frequencies. At millimeter-wave frequencies, you need to keep in mind the gate resistance. If you treat the gate resistance and capacitance as being in series, then the maximum power to the gate resistance also results in the maximum voltage across the gate capacitance. Its a simplified model though. As gain is scarce at millimeter-wave frequencies, it may be better to do an actual impedance match since in theory you can get higher gain.

It also depends on the Q of the inductors and capacitors which you have to do the matching. For the specific kind of matching network you want to use, the network Q and the component Q, you may or may not see any benefit.

Last point is that even if you were to treat the input impedance as purely imaginary, the highest voltage gain is not achieved with an LC resonance. You can always get higher gain by using a step-up transformer. The tradeoff is typically bandwidth and whether or not its practical to implement.


regards,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
vivarf
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 35

Re: Resonance load or (inter-stage) impedance matching for CMOS amplifiers
Reply #2 - Feb 18th, 2013, 2:52am
 
Thanks aaron,

What you said about MOSFET is true. And if the first stage is treated as voltage source then definitely conjugate matching will provide maximum voltage drop at the next gate. However, I believe that the first stage is more like current source. You may want to maximize the current go through the gate of the second stage which leading to using resonance LC at the output of the first stage. Am I missing something???
Back to top
 
 
View Profile veeater   IP Logged
vivarf
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 35

Re: Resonance load or (inter-stage) impedance matching for CMOS amplifiers
Reply #3 - Feb 18th, 2013, 6:36pm
 
vivarf wrote on Feb 18th, 2013, 2:52am:
Thanks aaron,

What you said about MOSFET is true. And if the first stage is treated as voltage source then definitely conjugate matching will provide maximum voltage drop at the next gate. However, I believe that the first stage is more like current source. You may want to maximize the current go through the gate of the second stage which leading to using resonance LC at the output of the first stage. Am I missing something???


I think I was confused  :-[. Just made a calculation, eventually, matching network provides the largest voltage on Cgs  :).
Back to top
 
 
View Profile veeater   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.