The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 2nd, 2024, 9:18pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Low frequency bandpass filter (Read 8235 times)
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Low frequency bandpass filter
Aug 11th, 2013, 1:24pm
 
Hi all,

I am about to design a low frequency bandpass filter, probably 2nd order. The passband is 0.2Hz to 100Hz.

My first thought is to use switched cap filters ... but maybe a gm-C filter will also be feasible ?

Can we safely rule out opamp-RC topologies ?

Any thoughts on the matter would be very much appreciated ...

Thanks ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #1 - Aug 18th, 2013, 3:37am
 
Hi harpoon, I was absent for 8 days, therefore my late response.

I think, you shouldn`t rule out RC opamp filters from the beginning.
Based on a filter design program I arrived at a maximum capacitance of 3.5 µF and Rmax=10 kOhms.
The filter topology is based on integrators (two opamps for 2nd order).
Single-opamp topologies are possible but require larger capacitances (150 µF).
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #2 - Aug 18th, 2013, 11:37am
 
Another possibility - if you are taking this signal into an ADC, digitally filter it after ADC - thus saving a lot of physical device space.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #3 - Aug 19th, 2013, 2:22am
 
Hi buddypoor,

I should really have said that I am looking for an on-chip solution.

3.5uF cap on a chip is really too big ! For a 2fF/um^2 MIM cap, this equates to a cap area of ~42mm x 42mm ... much bigger than a standard wafer reticle size !

The filter is there to filter low f noise (drifts) and DC offsets, I was actually thinking of putting an amplifier in there as well to reduce the noise effect of the ADC downstream ... so pretty much have to be before the ADC.

So you can see where I am going with this ...

So far from literature searches ...

gm-c : Problematic generating a low enough gm (consistently over PVT) or a big enough C

switched-c : have to contend with very big C ratios

interesting real world challenge ! ...  ;)
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #4 - Aug 19th, 2013, 3:09am
 
harpoon wrote on Aug 19th, 2013, 2:22am:
switched-c : have to contend with very big C ratios


OK - of course, for on-chip solutions there is no chance to realize RC filters.
Regarding S/C technique: I suppose you know that the time constant is set by a capacitor ratio AND the takt rate?
Thus, why do you expect "very big" ratios?
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #5 - Aug 19th, 2013, 7:11am
 
here are my first order back of envelope calc ...

at 0.2 Hz, the time constant needed is ~0.8s

tau = Cf/Cin * 1/fclk

fclk needs to be high-ish, at least an order higher than the 100Hz bandpass upper corner, say it is 2kHz

this means Cf/Cin is roughly 1600 !

if Cin is ~100fF, Cf needs to be ~160pF ... which is big on chip (but maybe not that unreasonable).

Maybe I should re-visit my cap-multiplier circuit again for this ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #6 - Aug 19th, 2013, 7:21am
 
Yes - I see the problem.
I think, it is mainly caused by the large relative bandwidth.
Therefore: perhaps it is better to use a high pass (corner at 0.2 Hz) followed by a low pass (corner at 100 Hz)?
In this case, you must use two different clock frequencies.
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #7 - Aug 20th, 2013, 3:41am
 
hi buddypoor,

thanks for your comments ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Lex
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 201
Eindhoven, Holland
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #8 - Aug 21st, 2013, 11:44pm
 
Any possibility to up convert the signal to a higher frequency band? E.g. chopping?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #9 - Aug 22nd, 2013, 12:30am
 
Lex wrote on Aug 21st, 2013, 11:44pm:
Any possibility to up convert the signal to a higher frequency band? E.g. chopping?


I am afraid not ... I am looking at an implementation suggested in this paper ...
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=34666

looks promising ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #10 - Aug 22nd, 2013, 5:45am
 
buddypoor wrote on Aug 18th, 2013, 3:37am:
Based on a filter design program I arrived at a maximum capacitance of 3.5 µF and Rmax=10 kOhms.
The filter topology is based on integrators (two opamps for 2nd order).


Hi buddypoor,

I was just looking at these numbers you posted ... 3.5uF and 10kOhm to generate a 0.2Hz corner looks too good to be true, can you check if this is correct ? thanks ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #11 - Aug 22nd, 2013, 6:25am
 
harpoon wrote on Aug 22nd, 2013, 5:45am:
Hi buddypoor,

I was just looking at these numbers you posted ... 3.5uF and 10kOhm to generate a 0.2Hz corner looks too good to be true, can you check if this is correct ? thanks ...


It is a bandpass with a mid frequency of app. 4.5 Hz.
Corner frequencies (3 dB) at 0.2 Hz and 100 Hz.
Topology: Tow-Thomas (2 integrators) - that means: 2 capacitors.
The given values (10k, 3.5µF) are correct.

Please note that sometimes there is a confusion regarding the order of a bandpass.
Lowest possible order is n=2 (Denominator polynominal of 2nd order).
Some authors/programs claim that this would be first  order (n=1).
However, this is not correct: The order is determined by the denominator.

For a higher order (n=4 with 4 capacitors) I get: Rmax=10k and Cmax=79 µF
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Low frequency bandpass filter
Reply #12 - Aug 23rd, 2013, 5:53am
 
buddypoor wrote on Aug 22nd, 2013, 6:25am:
It is a bandpass with a mid frequency of app. 4.5 Hz.
Corner frequencies (3 dB) at 0.2 Hz and 100 Hz.
Topology: Tow-Thomas (2 integrators) - that means: 2 capacitors.
The given values (10k, 3.5µF) are correct.

Please note that sometimes there is a confusion regarding the order of a bandpass.
Lowest possible order is n=2 (Denominator polynominal of 2nd order).
Some authors/programs claim that this would be first  order (n=1).
However, this is not correct: The order is determined by the denominator.

For a higher order (n=4 with 4 capacitors) I get: Rmax=10k and Cmax=79 µF


thanks ...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.