The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 19th, 2024, 12:28pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
What are the pros of pseudo-differential ring oscillators compared with single-e (Read 2986 times)
zczc999
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3

What are the pros of pseudo-differential ring oscillators compared with single-e
May 17th, 2014, 7:39am
 
   Hi,

   I am designing a VCO, but confused with single-ended and pseudo-differential RO.
   What are the main difference between them, with respect to phase noise, PSRR, common mode rejection, et al.

   As I know, single-ended RO is less power consuming, better phase noise performance(because PMOS and Nmos can be turned off ??), but its PSRR and common mode rejection are lousy.

   For pseudo differential RO, transistors can also be turned off, so the phase noise is better than full differential, but it doesn't have a tail current source, so the common mode reject is also not good.

   Since single-ended and pseudo-differential ROs both are bad at common mode rejection PSRR, what is the advantage of pseudo-differential compared with single-ended.

[img][/img]
Back to top
 

unbound4.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: What are the pros of pseudo-differential ring oscillators compared with single-e
Reply #1 - May 22nd, 2014, 4:04pm
 
strongly suggest that you use delay cells in the ring oscillator that are differential (or complementary) in signal output and differential in reception.

Without that you will have some ugly jitter and sensitivity to both ground and power rail noise.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
rf-design
Senior Member
****
Offline

Reiner Franke

Posts: 165
Germany
Re: What are the pros of pseudo-differential ring oscillators compared with single-e
Reply #2 - Jun 6th, 2014, 1:42am
 
If the supply noise induced jitter is not tolerable for a simple inverter based ring oscillator the current controlled differential is possible not much better for supply noise frequencies which are typical in digital systems.

A better solution is to complete isolate the supply of the ring oscillator and using the supply direct as frequency control for the oscillator. Then using a decoupling cap on this supply and using a voltage regulator which a current output stage driving this isolated supply. This circuit give you isolation, linear frequency control and best trade of current vs. phase noise. The downside is that you have to level shift the ring oscillator swing  to you regular digital supply. But be aware, if the further osillator signal distribution is jitter sensitive you need to run this on a further isolated or regulated supply.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.