The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 19th, 2024, 8:44pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
accuracy of phase noise sim (Read 4748 times)
pletch
New Member
*
Offline

Berkeley, CA

Posts: 3
Berkeley, CA
accuracy of phase noise sim
Jul 14th, 2005, 1:12pm
 
Hi,

I'm simulating phase noise for a pretty standard LC VCO and I get the following warning from the pnoise analysis:


**********************************************************************
Periodic Noise Analysis `pnoise': freq = 3.03189 GHz + (1 kHz -> 1 MHz)
***********************************************************************
Using the operating-point information generated by PSS analysis `pss'.

Warning from spectre at freq = 1 kHz during PNoise analysis `pnoise'.
   Relative residual of linear system is significantly above tolerance.
       Results may be inaccurate.

   pnoise: freq = 1 kHz          (0 %), step = 0 Hz            (0 %)

The pss analysis seems to complete fine and the results seem reasonable.  I have tried tightening simulator tolerances, increasing maxacfreq, and the standard pnoise solver and oscsolver modes (instead of turbo).  I still get the warnings at almost every frequency step out to about 1MHz.

I'm not sure if I can trust these results or not because of the warning.  Can anyone recommend a course of action to correct the warning?  The message seems to suggest I need to increase tolerances, but I don't want inaccurate simulation results.

Thanks,
nate
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2384
Silicon Valley
Re: accuracy of phase noise sim
Reply #1 - Jul 14th, 2005, 5:37pm
 
Try sweeping from 1MHz to 1KHz.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
pletch
New Member
*
Offline

Berkeley, CA

Posts: 3
Berkeley, CA
Re: accuracy of phase noise sim
Reply #2 - Jul 15th, 2005, 9:09am
 
Hi Ken,

Thanks for the tip.  Unfortunately, I get the same result in reverse.  The first couple of points at larger offsets (>1MHz), have no warnings.  However, pnoise still generates the same warnings from 1MHz on down.

I tried more points per decade and starting from 10MHz and 1MHz, all with the same result.  Any other possibilities I might try?  This one's a tough one because the warning doesn't give any clear path to resolution, at least for me.

Thanks again for your help.

nate
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2384
Silicon Valley
Re: accuracy of phase noise sim
Reply #3 - Jul 15th, 2005, 5:05pm
 
My recommendation would be to report the problem as a bug and then send the circuit to Cadence to see if they can figure out what is going wrong.

-Ken
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
pletch
New Member
*
Offline

Berkeley, CA

Posts: 3
Berkeley, CA
Re: accuracy of phase noise sim
Reply #4 - Jul 15th, 2005, 5:16pm
 
Sounds good Ken.  I'm also pursuing that avenue but I thought I would post here in the meantime, just in case it was a simple fix.

Thanks,
nate
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.