Designer’s Guide Community

rajdeep

Senior Member

Offline

Posts: 220
UK

problem with $realtime ???
May 31^st, 2006, 5:04am

Hi all, I am trying to model a sawtooth generator using verilog-A (not AMS, so I cannot use idtmod). The code looks like :

@(timer(0,period)) begin
offset = $realtime;
slope= 5e7;
end

V(ramp_out) <+ slope*($realtime - offset);

This works fine for a simulation time less than 10us. But once I set the simulation time somewhat higher than that, the output just goes bizzare!!! Number of triangles in the o/p starts to get flattened out .
I'm not sure why it is happenning??? Does $realtime have anything to do with the simulation time???

Plz help
Rajdeep

Back to top

Design is fun, verification is a requirement.

IP Logged

rajdeep

Senior Member

Offline

Posts: 220
UK

Re: problem with $realtime ???
Reply #1 - May 31^st, 2006, 5:24am

Sorry folks!!! I got the solution. I have to increase the timestep of the simulation to the order of ns ,
But still can anybody suggest a way to circumvent this type of problem, where the inaccuracy is due to timestep of the simulation.
I forgot to mention , the period used in the code is 0.5us.....that's why probably a 1us simulation time step was not enough.

Rajdeep

Back to top

Design is fun, verification is a requirement.

IP Logged

bernd Senior Member Offline Posts: 229 Munich/Germany	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #2 - May 31^st, 2006, 6:11am I assume you have set errpreset to liberal, with modifies the parameter reltol and sets the integration method to 'gear2' which damps the signal. Try with errpreset == moderate Bernd
Back to top	Just another lonesome cad guy IP Logged

rajdeep Senior Member Offline Posts: 220 UK	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #3 - May 31^st, 2006, 6:16am It didn't even worked with conservative :-/..
Back to top	Design is fun, verification is a requirement. IP Logged

bernd Senior Member Offline Posts: 229 Munich/Germany	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #4 - May 31^st, 2006, 6:26am Why do you set the time step at all? Spectre in general computes the best time step internally. Bernd
Back to top	Just another lonesome cad guy IP Logged

Ken Kundert Global Moderator Offline Posts: 2384 Silicon Valley	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #5 - May 31^st, 2006, 7:19am It seems to me that you should be using $abstime rather than $realtime. Also, idtmod() should be available in Verilog-A.
Back to top	IP Logged

rajdeep Senior Member Offline Posts: 220 UK	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #6 - May 31^st, 2006, 7:22am Otherwise, it was not working. I don't think it can actually choose a good timestep by itself. Maybe it fails to do so n case of verilogA models. A timestep of 10nS is giving fine result
Back to top	Design is fun, verification is a requirement. IP Logged

rajdeep Senior Member Offline Posts: 220 UK	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #7 - May 31^st, 2006, 7:28am Is it the same Ken Kundert who wrote the book on Verilog-AMS???/ I have tried with abstime..didnot change. Infact, it gives a warning to change $realtime with $abstime!!! Don't know!! I cudnot find idtmod in the whole Verilog-A LRM...i shud have tried though. Thanks Rajdeep
Back to top	Design is fun, verification is a requirement. IP Logged

Jess Chen

Community Fellow

Offline

Posts: 380
California Bay Area

Re: problem with $realtime ???
Reply #8 - May 31^st, 2006, 8:27am

You could also try $bound_step. I am not sure I have the syntax correct but this VerilogA command limits the size of the time steps. You can use this command to link the maximum step size to a frequency or slope defined elsewhere in the code.

As a side note: if you are resetting your integral when some event occurs, you may want to use a @cross statement to make sure the reset occurs with the desired time resolution.

-Jess

Back to top

IP Logged

Geoffrey_Coram Senior Fellow Offline Posts: 1998 Massachusetts, USA	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #9 - May 31^st, 2006, 9:11am Rather than @cross, you might want to investigate the optional 3rd argument -- timetol -- for the timer event.
Back to top	If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time. IP Logged

Geoffrey_Coram

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1998
Massachusetts, USA

Re: problem with $realtime ???
Reply #10 - May 31^st, 2006, 9:27am

rajdeep wrote on May 31^st, 2006, 7:28am:

Is it the same Ken Kundert who wrote the book on Verilog-AMS???/
I have tried with abstime..didnot change. Infact, it gives a warning to change $realtime with $abstime!!!

Don't know!! I cudnot find idtmod in the whole Verilog-A LRM...i shud have tried though.

1) Yes, it's the same Ken.

2) The simulator I'm using says that $abstime should be used instead of $realtime.

3) idtmod is in 4.4.6 of the Verilog-AMS LRM 2.2 (and the same section in 2.1), titled "Circular integrator operator"

Back to top

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.

IP Logged

rajdeep Senior Member Offline Posts: 220 UK	Re: problem with $realtime ??? Reply #11 - May 31^st, 2006, 12:59pm Thanks a lot folks!! I will try all the options. Infact, was thinking of timetol option before leaving for home. The cross option will make the code somewhat clumsy I guess...but then if it works fine. Thanks, Rajdeep
Back to top	Design is fun, verification is a requirement. IP Logged