The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 17th, 2024, 7:05pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ? (Read 1823 times)
DBRF1
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Nov 21st, 2006, 6:08am
 
Hi
We are using  a standard NF meter to measure the NF of our ZIF reciever IC { 5GHz to analog BB }in the Lab.
Thus we can measyre from LNA in to either I or Q out {but not both simultaneously }
So my question isif the measured NF reading is 5dB does this mean the overall "Receiver NF" is 2dB or
how do we account for the un measured quadrature channel ?

Thanks


DBRF1
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Jess Chen
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 380
California Bay Area
Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #1 - Nov 21st, 2006, 8:48am
 
It does not matter whether you measure noise figure with one or both I/Q outputs. If you use both, you double the signal but you also double the noise; the NF remains the same.

The more relevant question is whether you are measuring single side band or double side band noise figure. The difference is 3dB. The SSB noise figure will be higher because noise from either sideband contributes to the I (or Q) output but the SSB noise figure calculation only accounts for noise on one sideband. The DSB calculation accounts for noise in both input sidebands and is therefore 3dB lower than the SSB measurement. Since for ZIF, both sidebands contain signal, the DSB NF is the appropriate measurement.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
DBRF1
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #2 - Nov 21st, 2006, 11:41am
 
Jess thanks for the reply
A few questions to double the signal you assume we shift the I {or Q by } by 90 degs then we can add 2 signals in phase hence get 6dB increase in voltage.
Does the same apply to the noise  . Doesn't it depend if there is a noise contribution from the mixers thus the I noise will not be totally correlated with the
Q noise so it is not true to say that the noise on the I branch is in Quadrature with the noise on the I branch ??/

Also wrt the DSB/SSB NF comments.  My understanding was that for a ZIF rx there is NO image band  so in fact for this type of receiver the DSB and SSB NF are the same as ther is in fact only one Signal band  .   { Image = Wanted +/- 2*IF   , IF = 0  thus image = wanted  }  ??

DBRF1
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Jess Chen
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 380
California Bay Area
Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #3 - Nov 21st, 2006, 1:33pm
 
We are interested in noise within a relatively narrow bandwidth. Narrow band noise can be expressed as
x(t)*cos(w*t)-y(t)*sin(wt) where "w" is the carrier frequency in radians per second.  These are the I and Q components of the input RF noise of interest by definition. The question is whether x(t) and y(t) are correlated. If we assume the RF noise is wide sense stationary (i.e. that the statistics do not depend on time), one can show that x(t) and y(t) are indeed uncorrelated. (That does not necessarily mean that x(t) and y(t+tau) are uncorrelated.) The paper on RF modeling posted to this website touches on this derivation. If you read that paper, note that equation 53 has some typos.

Do you really need to combine the I and Q outputs to measure noise figure? How are you driving the RF input when you combine the signals?

Regarding the DSB/SSB issue, I suggest that you determine whether your measurement injects noise on both sides of the carrier. Ideally, you should inject noise over a band that corresponds to your signal band. If your signal occupies bandwidth on either side of the carrier, your noise source should too. If it does not, your noise figure measurement will be too high.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
ACWWong
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 539
Oxford, UK
Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #4 - Nov 22nd, 2006, 12:14pm
 
In ZIF recievers I have worked on (for GSM/EDGE) we always measured noise figure on I or Q (the results being the same). This is what we quoted on datasheets/what the baseband DSP guys wanted.

DBRF1 wrote on Nov 21st, 2006, 11:41am:
Also wrt the DSB/SSB NF comments.  My understanding was that for a ZIF rx there is NO image band  so in fact for this type of receiver the DSB and SSB NF are the same as ther is in fact only one Signal band  .   { Image = Wanted +/- 2*IF   , IF = 0  thus image = wanted  }  ??


I agree with Jess's comments, i have measured the NF of a ZIF transciever in two ways:
1) C/N method: Using a CW carrier one side of the LO, so had to adjust the NF by -3dB to account for the fact the modulated input signal would occupy both sides (the noise was both side of the LO... its a bit diffcult for it not to be).
2) Measuemnt with noise diode (Y-factor method) gives the same result... without the need for the 3dB adjustment.

The treatment of this in Razavi's "RF Microelectronics" p183 is quite good, and aglient do a good app note on y-factor noise measurement.


DBRF1 wrote on Nov 21st, 2006, 11:41am:
Jess thanks for the reply
A few questions to double the signal you assume we shift the I {or Q by } by 90 degs then we can add 2 signals in phase hence get 6dB increase in voltage.


I used to think of it as adding signal I and Q in vector form, so you add as squares (I^2+Q^2)....  noise also adds as squares... not sure if my loose thinking is strictly correct but i managed to convince myself quite easily  ;)
Best way to convince yourself is if you have a dual channel VSA (Vector signal analyser) like HP89441 or R&S FSIQ... then you can measure NF on I or Q using C/N method with -3dB correction factor, and then put the VSA in I+jQ demodulation mode to see it give you the same/similar NF or C/N.


cheers
aw
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #5 - Nov 29th, 2006, 8:01pm
 
Hi all,

I managed to prove to myself that the zero-IF receiver has a minimum noise figure of 3 dB but since you managed to measure differently i guess i'm wrong...

Anyway quadrature mixing is required since the phase difference between the LO and RF causes signal loss due to folding. The noise does not experience the same loss however and so the noise figure takes a 3 db hit. Its easy to prove using a frequency modulated signal multiplied by a LO signal of equal frequency and unknown phase. The signal amplitude peaks at a certain phase and equals zero 90 degrees later. The noise however does not experience the same loss and so NFmin = 3 dB. I think all the equations you need to prove it are found in Digital and Analog Communications Systems by Couch.

Anybody know where i went wrong? I can send equations...

cheers,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
cheelee
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2

Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #6 - Nov 30th, 2006, 5:37pm
 
Maybe you meant (I have not worked out the maths) ZIF demodulator/mixer, but put a LNA with NF<3dB and infinite gain in front of your ZIF mixer/demodulator, you get receiver NF<3dB.

I have used 'similar' approaches described by ACCWong, except that I have not measured the NF on I or Q channels only, always I+jQ.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: ZIF NF Measurement  -3db ?
Reply #7 - Nov 30th, 2006, 8:34pm
 
Hi,

according to the math, it doesnt matter whether or not you have an ideal LNA in front. If you halve the SNR (by multiplication not by addition of noise/signal) your minimum NF is 3 dB regardless of the preceeding stages.

I am not familiar with noise measurement with a noise diode (Y-factor method) so i don't know about the 3 dB adjustment.

See if i can rework the maths and post it...maybe theres a problem there.

Aaron

Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.