The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Oct 1st, 2024, 7:26pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Layout question (Read 3328 times)
ee484
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 7

Layout question
Apr 09th, 2007, 6:56am
 
Hi, all.


I am currently doing layout for my chip.
As far as I know, I'd better place as many contacts as possible in the empty space in the chip so that they work as bypass capacitor.
Since I placed many contacts (for VSS and VDD), the signal wires have to run through these contacts. Of course, the signal path wires are MET2 and VSS and VDD underneath signal wires are MET1.

I am worrying anything below signal paths (in this case MET1 of VSS and VDD).

Please help me if you have any experience.

Another short question is if it is okay for a signal wire to run through VSS or VDD, then should I have to run a wire in parallel ? Or, it does not matter because VSS and VDD are DC.

Thank you all.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
ywguo
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 943
Shanghai, PRC
Re: Layout question
Reply #1 - Apr 9th, 2007, 8:13pm
 
Hi,

Quote:
As far as I know, I'd better place as many contacts as possible in the empty space in the chip so that they work as bypass capacitor.


Normally I put as many MOS transistors as possible in the empty space. Contacts are not capacitors.

Don't worry VSS and VDD underneath the signal path.


Thanks
Yawei
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
chase.ng
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 77
penang/malaysia
Re: Layout question
Reply #2 - Apr 10th, 2007, 1:24am
 
Hi,

What really a concern is the parasitic capacitance of signal path to ac gnd. Normally you would like to minimized them at all cost. Running signal in parallel with power will create large parasitic capacitance and should be avoided unless you need sheilding.

Do you mean you put a lot of substrate contacts?

Regards,
chase
Back to top
 
 

Chase
View Profile chase.ng   IP Logged
ywguo
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 943
Shanghai, PRC
Re: Layout question
Reply #3 - Apr 10th, 2007, 7:47pm
 
Hi, Chase,

I think you are right.

No, I don't put a lot of substrate contacts but some decoupling capacitors in the empty space.


Thanks
Yawei
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
LL
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 18
California
Re: Layout question
Reply #4 - Apr 21st, 2007, 12:25am
 
My rule of thumb is to fill all of the empty space with substrate ties to improve latchup.  Sub-ties are not just contact alone but contact+pdiff assuming a p-substate process.  This is done at the block level.  At the chip level, empty spaces are filled with caps, perhaps mos caps.  

cheers,
LL
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.