Monkeybad
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 31
|
Hi Berti I read this consideration from an article. And it refer to Mike Shuo-Wei Chen and Stanley Bo-Ting Wang "Design of a Low Power, Low Voltage, CMOS Fully Differential Operational Transconductance Amplifier" Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences in the University of California, Berkley. But sorry I can't find this reference. In my point of view, CMFB stability needs another analysis. We can break the CMFB loop and do the .AC analysis to find the frequency response. Check the PM to find out whether the CMFB is stable or not.
Yes you're right the SC-CMFB will degrade the DM BW, because the out load become larger. But compare to the continuous CMFB, SC-CMFB may consume less power. And it has some advantages such like it doesn't compress the out voltage swing. The Berti's opinion is very good. The CMFB BW should be as fast as DM BW. Even faster can be better. But it is difficult to achieve this goal in practice because the CMFB loop often incudes more transistors and has more non-dominant poles than the DM loop. And it would consume large power.
The DM loop BW is set by the DM input signal BW. So the CMFB BW is set by the CM input signal BW. If the variation of the CM input signal is small, the CMFB BW is not important. But there are other source can be the variation of the CM signal, not only the input signal source, such like the VDD noise, and the imbalance of the circuit that causes DM to CM. So even if the input signal is purely differential , there are still need a CMFB to suppress the other source of the CM variation.
|