The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 10:24pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
ideal OTA in cadence (Read 3534 times)
yixiusky
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 39

ideal OTA in cadence
May 28th, 2008, 1:43am
 
hello, i would like to ask one question:

We can make ideal opamp in cadence by using VCVS (in analog library)+lpf_1storder(in ahdl library).  VCVS set the gain of

Opamp, and the lpf_1storder can set the unity gain bandwidth of Opamp. then we can get ideal Opamp to simulate.

My question is here: I want to get ideal OTA to simulate OTA-C filter.   I choose VCCS in analog library to simulate, but i can

not get result, and i can not set the bandwidth of OTA also. So how can we get ideal OTA in cadence ?

Thank you very much ^^
Back to top
 
 
View Profile yixiusky   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #1 - May 28th, 2008, 5:01am
 
Probably, there are several aleternatives.
One method is to place a lowpass in front of the VCCS (and to use - if necessary - an additional subtracting unit as differential input).
Dont forget to specify a certain transconductance gm for the VCCS.
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
yixiusky
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 39

Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #2 - May 28th, 2008, 6:53am
 
Smileythank u very much ^^  I make like this shown in attached picture. Is this ok ?  Thank you very much !

I am sorry to ask what's "an additional subtracting unit" ? ^^

Back to top
 

cmfb.JPG
View Profile yixiusky   IP Logged
Eugene
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 262

Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #3 - May 28th, 2008, 8:09am
 
I have one comment unrelated to your original question. With buffers on either side of the filter you should not need to waste nodes on differential symmetry. I would remove one filter and reference the middle circuitry to ground.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #4 - May 28th, 2008, 12:06pm
 

I am sorry to ask what's "an additional subtracting unit" ? ^^  


The VCCS has a differential input, has it not ?
If you place a lowpass in front of the pos. input (neg. input to ground) you have lost one input.
Therefore, you have to add a unit which replaces the lost diff. input. And that is simply an adder with one neg. sign to  produce the difference between two signals.
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #5 - May 29th, 2008, 11:12pm
 
yixiusky wrote on May 28th, 2008, 6:53am:
Smileythank u very much ^^  I make like this shown in attached picture. Is this ok ?  Thank you very much !

I am sorry to ask what's "an additional subtracting unit" ? ^^



Hi,

If you want to make an ideal OTA, then I would suggest that you use the same structure which you would use to do the simplest hand analysis of your OTA:

A VCCS + output resistance in parallel. I would imagine that there is no need to build in the lowpass filters. When you connect the external capacitive
loads to this OTA model, the bandwidth will be automatically set, and will in fact more accurately track the load capacitance than if you plug in an ideal LPF
in between as you have done here. If you have a 2-stage opamp with internal compensation, a similar structural model suffices. In my experience, this is the most
accurate and simple model.  You can even set limits on the current of the VCCS to model slewing if you want !!!

Keep it as simple as possible but no simpler...

Regards
Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
yixiusky
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 39

Re: ideal OTA in cadence
Reply #6 - Jun 1st, 2008, 4:01am
 
Thank u very much vivkr  :)

Here i attach the OTA u suggest, is it right ? ^^  i attach two circuit, both are for differential input and differential outout.

Which one is right ?  :)
Back to top
 

New_Bitmap_Image.JPG
View Profile yixiusky   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.