The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 7th, 2024, 5:46pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Does a lower VCO freq. produce more error in the FB divider o/p in a frac-N-PLL? (Read 3174 times)
trond
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 168
Glasgow, Scotland
Does a lower VCO freq. produce more error in the FB divider o/p in a frac-N-PLL?
Aug 04th, 2008, 8:01am
 
This has puzzled me a bit today.

Scenario 1)
Consider a fractional-N PLL. The VCO frequency goes into a chain of 2/3 dividers which are set by the sigma-delta modulator. The SDM works with a 16bit input word and produces a 3 bit output. Hence the divider divides by either N-3, N-2, N-1, N, N+1, N+2, N+3, N+4. The output will be approx. 26MHz.

Scenario 2) same as above, but the VCO frequency is divided by a fixed factor of two before going into the divider. The SDM has the same resolution, so the fractional part should be represented with the same accuracy. Only the N number is smaller now as we need to divide only by half as much.

Q) Will there be a difference in accuracy of the clock produced at the output of the divider?

From a mathematical point of view there should not be any difference as the SDM which produces the fractional part has the same accuracy.

However, intuitively, I could also argue that since the periods of the input to the FB divider are larger in scenario two, the FB divider will have less "resolution" in dividing it down (or matching to) to 26MHz.

Could anyone please share their thoughts on this topic.

Regards,


Ps. The divider used is from:

A Family of Low-Power Truly Modular Programmable Dividers in Standard 0.35-m CMOS Technology
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
zwtang
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 11
Shanghai, P.R.China
Re: Does a lower VCO freq. produce more error in the FB divider o/p in a frac-N-PLL?
Reply #1 - Aug 19th, 2008, 9:37pm
 
The contribution to PLL phase noise from SDM quantization increases 6dB, because the timing resolution, the period of FB divider input, is double.

The  Frequency Conrtrol Word should be shifted right one bit.
The other characteristics of PLL are the same.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
trond
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 168
Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Does a lower VCO freq. produce more error in the FB divider o/p in a frac-N-PLL?
Reply #2 - Aug 20th, 2008, 5:13am
 
Thanks for you comment Zwtang.

1)
Could you please further elaborate how you ended up with your conclusion? Please see my thoughts below.

2)
Also, I am not certain what you mean by shifting the control word to the right and what it would do.

--------------

I can see why you are saying we loose 6dB in the phase noise.
In the paper "A Dual-Mode Truly Modular Programmable Fractional Divider Based on a 1/1.5 Divider Cell" the authors derive an equation for the phase noise:

S_phi = 1/M^2 [fout_ave/f]^2 Sq(t).

Here M is the division ratio, fout_ave is the average frequency at the output of the divider, q(t) is the error from the SDM modulator which approximated the fractional part of the division with a bit-stream.

So by halving M I would increase the phase noise by 6dB.


What do you think about this explanations?

Thanks,

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
zwtang
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 11
Shanghai, P.R.China
Re: Does a lower VCO freq. produce more error in the FB divider o/p in a frac-N-PLL?
Reply #3 - Aug 21st, 2008, 6:09am
 
1) The input frequency of FB divider is halving, output frequency, 26Mhz, is maintained, so the divide-ratio (FCW) should be halved.

2) I agree with your explanations very well.
Please refer to the paper "A Quantization Noise Suppression Technique for ΔΣ Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizers", Nov. 2006, JSSC, the same authors.

Best Regards,
zwtang
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.