The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 17th, 2024, 11:05pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
difference between phase noise testing and simulation (Read 4699 times)
xuel
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 5

difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Aug 04th, 2008, 7:33pm
 
In simulation the phasenoise is very good, is 100dbc at 1MHz.
But in testing, phasenoise is only 60dbc at 1MHz.
But the jitter is not large, 20ps peak-to-peak measured from oscilloscope.
Why is the measured phasenoise so bad?
Back to top
 

LOO3.GIF
View Profile   IP Logged
luantan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 4

Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Reply #1 - Aug 10th, 2008, 8:37am
 
anybody knows? Smiley
Back to top
 
 

begin to do
View Profile   IP Logged
ACWWong
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 539
Oxford, UK
Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Reply #2 - Aug 11th, 2008, 12:30am
 
I'm assuming your simulation gives -100dBc/Hz

In such a case your measurement shows about -95dBc/Hz at 1MHz offset.
That is -60dBc in a 3kHz RBW, so you need to adjust the marker by 10*logRBW=34.8 dB.

Often the analyser has the marker on noise function which will take into account the RBW automatically (and more accurately).

So in fact you are 5 to 6 dB of where you expect to be. The reasons for this can be many e.g. discrepenacy in models, simulation setup issues, measurement issues, PCB design, noise pickup etc.....
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
iaman
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 1
China,Shanghai
Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Reply #3 - Sep 12th, 2008, 8:32am
 
ACWWong wrote on Aug 11th, 2008, 12:30am:
I'm assuming your simulation gives -100dBc/Hz

In such a case your measurement shows about -95dBc/Hz at 1MHz offset.
That is -60dBc in a 3kHz RBW, so you need to adjust the marker by 10*logRBW=34.8 dB.

Often the analyser has the marker on noise function which will take into account the RBW automatically (and more accurately).

So in fact you are 5 to 6 dB of where you expect to be. The reasons for this can be many e.g. discrepenacy in models, simulation setup issues, measurement issues, PCB design, noise pickup etc.....


Great.
from the test picture, we can find some details:
1. RBW is 3kHz, so we should  normilized the PN to dBm/Hz.
2. the  Spectrum analiyzer power dector is peak dector , you should change the power dector to rms dector.
2.
Back to top
 
 

Simulate~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
View Profile iaman   IP Logged
RFsage
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3
Melbourne, Australia
Re: difference between phase noise testing and simulation
Reply #4 - Sep 15th, 2008, 12:53am
 
The phase noise at higher offset frequencies is generally limited to thermal or white noise floor of your load. If you are using a resistive load you should expect higher noise floor.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.