The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Aug 15th, 2024, 12:25pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
MOSFET time constant... (Read 886 times)
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

MOSFET time constant...
Sep 15th, 2008, 5:14am
 
Hi all,

this might be a very simple question but anyway...just wondering what is the time it takes for a channel to form in a MOSFET? For example if we have a fixed VDS and we apply a ramp to the gate from an ideal source, what would τ be in this expression...

I = VDS/RON (1-e(-t/τ))

thanks,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
nano_RF
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 50
madison
Re: MOSFET time constant...
Reply #1 - Sep 15th, 2008, 9:47am
 
aaron_do wrote on Sep 15th, 2008, 5:14am:
Hi all,

this might be a very simple question but anyway...just wondering what is the time it takes for a channel to form in a MOSFET? For example if we have a fixed VDS and we apply a ramp to the gate from an ideal source, what would τ be in this expression...

I = VDS/RON (1-e(-t/τ))

thanks,
Aaron


Hi Aaron,

Never really thought it in this way. I do see a problem in your formulation though. The RON is going to be Vgs or gate overdrive dependent. And i would think the time constant to be the product of the parasitic Cgs and the RON of the device. Does it makes sense?

Regards,
--Vikas
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: MOSFET time constant...
Reply #2 - Sep 15th, 2008, 8:22pm
 
Aaron:

First order the resistance of the gates (distributed and awkward to define, but a first order guesstimate can be done) will be the resistance. The newer BSIM models (4.4 and later IIRC) has the Rgate in the model (although a LOT of foundries let it default to zero!) so in theory its in the model, but the value is not properly set most of the time.

The capacitance however is a bit different, it is nonlinear in nature due to the distributed depletion regions. (think PN junctions changing depletion regions) So here, you have Cgs, Cgd, Cgb as first order estimates. Not sure if the nonlinear nature of the capacitnace is in the model at all. Would have to go digging in the model details.

A suggestion: Most people do the layout of the transistors so that the Rgate is low enough (small widths for short gate stripes) to get the RC time constant small enough to not affect the performance.

That is not a definitive answer, but it is a way to get it out of the design problem.

Jerry
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: MOSFET time constant...
Reply #3 - Sep 15th, 2008, 11:07pm
 
Hi Aaron,

In addition to the points made by the others:

The charge in the channel is primarily sourced by the source/drain diffusion regions. As such, one would need to also account for the time it takes for the carriers to drift from the source and to spread out into the entire channel. This is relevant if you are dealing with extremely long channels. Otherwise, this effect should be negligible.

I am not sure but a foundry which accounts for NQS effects should be able to provide a model which automatically considers most of the effects responsible for the timeconstant you are talking about, certainly those related to gate resistance. Usually, any model intended for RF-CMOS should have the NQS feature enabled and modelled.

Regards,

Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: MOSFET time constant...
Reply #4 - Sep 17th, 2008, 8:20pm
 
thanks for all the replies

I'm trying to think in terms of mixer design. For a down-conversion mixer, the output we're concerned with is at a much lower frequency than the switching. So i'm wondering if the main limitation on the switching is not the fT of the device, but the maximum speed at which the channel can switch. Does this seem reasonable?

thanks,
Aaron

BTW NQS gate resistance is approximately 1/5gdo right? So as a crude estimate, can we say (Cgs+Cgd)/5gd0 is the RC time constant? i.e. 3dB switching is approx. 5fT...
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.