The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 20th, 2024, 11:38am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC (Read 3181 times)
Mahavir
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 8
India
DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC
Nov 08th, 2008, 11:58am
 


Hello Friends,
I need your help.......

I am working on BIST of Digital to Analog Converters and I need to generate a signal on-chip to measure SFDR and SINAD ratio of DAC.
Generally SFDR of DAC is defined with assuming input as digital bit pattern for monotonic sine wave. But I want to know which signal will prove to be worst case input for DAC such that a DAC giving reasonable SFDR for that signal will always be considered to work for other type of input bit-patterns.
Also plz tell me are there any other methods to calculate SFDR except the conventional frequency spectrum and FFT calculation based one?

Thanks in Advance
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Mahavir   IP Logged
Peruzzi
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 71

Re: DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC
Reply #1 - Nov 8th, 2008, 12:46pm
 
Mahavir,

What kind of DAC is it?  How many bits? Weighted or equal elements?

Do you have an on-chip ADC?  How many bits?

I can think of a few possibilities, depending on what's in there.

- Bob Peruzzi


Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Mahavir
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 8
India
Re: DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC
Reply #2 - Nov 8th, 2008, 1:01pm
 
Well, I am supposed to design the BIST architecture assuming the DAC to be a black box. It will be a 8-bit DAC. Once the BIST for DAC is designed I wish to extend it further to sort of correcting error incurred.
The application I am planning to go for is communication DAC. I am also not very sure about what difference the architecture will make on the BIST. Through literature survey I found that generally hey prefer testing for static parameters than dynamic ones like SFDR and SNR
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Mahavir   IP Logged
rf-design
Senior Member
****
Offline

Reiner Franke

Posts: 165
Germany
Re: DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC
Reply #3 - Dec 15th, 2008, 2:50pm
 
The device yield coverage is very good for DAC's with static values. That is because there are no functional caps.

In worst case you have to step linear trough all values. If the architecture is segmented you test a number of MSB bits in the linear mode and the remaining LSB bits with leading rolling 1 or 0. The should give some hundred BIST gates.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
ywguo
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 943
Shanghai, PRC
Re: DAC Testing, worst case input bit pattern for maesurement of SFDR in DAC
Reply #4 - Dec 17th, 2008, 8:39am
 
Hi,

I would like to integrate a DDFS with the DAC. DDFS can generate a sinusoidal signal. The DAC output is fed to a spectrum analyzer for measuring SFDR. As well known, the SFDR is related to DNL/INL in fact. Furthurmore, SFDR is important for a communication DAC. Right?
Sure it is not feasible if the DAC output is NOT available outside the chip.
Any literature on BIST for DAC, please share it with us.


Yawei
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.