The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 31st, 2024, 7:20pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor (Read 5948 times)
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Oct 23rd, 2010, 7:10pm
 
is it a common practice to put nmos capacitors underneath of Mim Cap (M5-M6) since the Mim cap underneath is blank.   The mim cap are used in the low-passed filter  in my PLL design.  

Normally I see the pll design with only mim cap only. Any reason for that?
I am aware that nmos cap capacitance is dependent on Vg and has lower Q than mim cap.
What if the vctrl voltage is near to power supply vdd, then the Vg is not a matter already, is it true?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #1 - Oct 23rd, 2010, 10:11pm
 
hi,
its not general practice is to keep any thing underneath the MIM cap because it will add bottom plate capacitance, it would create problems in circuits. But for pll loop-filter its very difficult to put MIM because it occupies lot of area. For loop filter why Q will be matter, may be it slightly changes loop dynamic.

Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #2 - Oct 25th, 2010, 6:21am
 
raja.cedt wrote on Oct 23rd, 2010, 10:11pm:
But for pll loop-filter its very difficult to put MIM because it occupies lot of area.


What do you use for the PLL loop filter? NMOS cap??
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
RobG
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Bozeman, MT
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #3 - Oct 29th, 2010, 8:15am
 
newic wrote on Oct 23rd, 2010, 7:10pm:
is it a common practice to put nmos capacitors underneath of Mim Cap (M5-M6) since the Mim cap underneath is blank.   The mim cap are used in the low-passed filter  in my PLL design.  


It is probably in parallel, not series. Parallel connection is done to increase the cap for a given amount of area. If your design can tolerate the peculiarities of a MOS cap it is a good way to save area (if the design rules allow it). On the other hand, putting them in series is a good way to get laid off Wink

rg
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #4 - Oct 31st, 2010, 2:05am
 
hi newic,
i am using nmos cap.

Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
panditabupesh
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 36
Toronto
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #5 - Nov 24th, 2010, 2:04pm
 
One would avoid nmos cap for two reasons:
1. leakage
2. Dependence of capacitance value on gate voltage. Due to some startup conditions if the cap value is drastically different from ideal value the loop may never recover.

Bupesh
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #6 - Nov 24th, 2010, 9:22pm
 
hi Bupesh,
but normally in pll loop filter design as a main filtering cap nmos is the best up to my knowledge, because it will be around 500pf or some thing for plls BW with around 5MHz. is it possible for you to put apart from this cap like metal or some thing?

Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
panditabupesh
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 36
Toronto
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #7 - Nov 25th, 2010, 6:55am
 
Hi,
In that case I think one would use a thick oxide version  to reduce leakage  and some kind of native device (or nmos in nwell) to reduce the cap dependence on gate voltage.

Bupesh


Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: MiM cap in series with nmos capacitor
Reply #8 - Nov 25th, 2010, 7:31pm
 
hi,
i completely agree with you, to reduce the leakage thick oxide is fine but in every process you don't get all devices you want and because of leakage no need to rul out nmos cap as long as you are ok with reference spur you got is fine. Once i did pll for wireless application there i have used metal caps there i can't use any mos family which gave me 35x more area.

Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.