The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 30th, 2024, 8:55am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
BJT vs MOSFET (Read 9812 times)
summi
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 38

BJT vs MOSFET
Nov 12th, 2011, 10:30am
 
Dear Forum,
Can any one kindly explain why BJT is much faster than MOSFET?

Br,
Summi.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: BJT vs MOSFET
Reply #1 - Nov 12th, 2011, 10:38am
 
hello,
Bjt speed depends on the base width, Mosfet speed depends on Channel lenght. In verical BJT's width defined by diffusion where as Channel lenght defined by Lithography. With diffusion we can finer dimentions compared to lithography, hence BJT is faster than mosfet.

Thanks,
Raj.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: BJT vs MOSFET
Reply #2 - Nov 14th, 2011, 10:18am
 
Hm... oversimplification, the mobility of electrons, thickness of the base region and other things also play into it.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
vivkr
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 780

Re: BJT vs MOSFET
Reply #3 - Nov 15th, 2011, 3:06am
 
agree with Jerry fully. You need to compare apples to apples. What does it mean when someone says that a BJT is faster than a MOSFET? For any realistic comparison, you need to look at BJTs and MOSFETs in the same or similar technology nodes.

1. BJTs as bulk devices will have higher carrier mobility. MOS as surface device will have lower mobility.

2. Intrinsic gm/Id is higher for BJTs than for MOSFETs. SOI MOS will tend to fare better than a bulk MOS.

3. Depending on make, BJTs have some speed limitation due to base charge recombination time. I think that modern SiGe doped HBTs don't suffer from this limitation anymore.

4. On the other hand, MOS dimensions can be shrunk quite aggressively, and the intrinsic drift time may thus be still not be so far from that of a BJT despite lower mobility.

Again, there are too many variables in question for you to make a clear statement. The fact however is that BJTs are HUGE in size and much more expensive to manufacture in MOS process because they come require additional steps.

So nobody would make or use BJTs in modern processes unless they could make them significantly faster than the available MOS devices. The textbook explanation that a BJT is always faster than a MOS is as banal and missing the point as quoting Moore's Law to say that transistor density will keep doubling over time. Someone has to actually work to make those BJTs faster than the best available MOS in each process generation! Until the introduction of commercial SiGe HBTs and vertical scaling of base width a decade or so ago, it was not self-evident that the BJT would survive for long.

Vivek
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Kevin Aylward
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 52

Re: BJT vs MOSFET
Reply #4 - Aug 4th, 2013, 2:39am
 
vivkr wrote on Nov 15th, 2011, 3:06am:
agree with Jerry fully.
So nobody would make or use BJTs in modern processes unless they could make them significantly faster than the available MOS devices.

Vivek

I Disagree. Bipolars are extremely useful, irrespective of speed. For low frequency noise, it’s a no contest. Mos are almost useless for low frequency noise design. It is they that must be huge relative to bipolars to reduce their 1/f noise. Matching is also way better for bipolars. Bipolar use is also a no contest for high performance bandgap design. Or even for wideband noise,  an emitter follower buffer has much lower noise than an equivalent mos design.  Given the option, I would always chose a BiCmos process.
Back to top
 
 

Kevin Aylward
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
tm123
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 67
Chicago, IL
Re: BJT vs MOSFET
Reply #5 - Aug 5th, 2013, 9:52am
 
How do you define 'modern processes'?  No one is making BJTs in a 28nm process, but in >0.13um BJTs are a much better choice if you are designing for high performance and/or low power.  Of course it comes at the expense of higher cost from more complex fabrication.  Also, BJTs offer much better 1/f noise performance and device matching as Kevin described.  If you want to know what determines the speed of a device, have a look at the ft equations for BJT and MOS.  The Gray/Meyer text has a nice section on device operation without getting too heavy into equations.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.