The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 30th, 2024, 7:16pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Comparison of RMS Jcc [40,000] in BW vs.  Manual Integrated Noise in a BW. (Read 1488 times)
ic_engr
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 135

Comparison of RMS Jcc [40,000] in BW vs.  Manual Integrated Noise in a BW.
Apr 04th, 2012, 1:02pm
 
Hello,

I have a ring oscillator. I ran pss-pnoise (modulated). I then tried to calculate Jcc using the form. I have the following questions:

1. Jcc [k] cycles. Does k refer to 1000s or just number of cycles. What I am asking is if I enter 100 is the calculation based on k=100 cycles or is it assuming 100K cycles i.e. 100,000 cycles.

I then caclulated Jcc for 40,000k cycles and I integrated the BW from 1kHz to 2MHz and I got Jcc=2.2nsec. I set the calculation as RMS.

2. I also ploted PNOISE magnitude and performed square, integrated in 1kHz-2MHz and then Square rooted. I got 23.7mV. I measured the slew rate of one cycle of the oscillator in pss simulation The SR=70MV/sec.
I divided 23.7mV/70MV/sec and got 338.7psec. I am assuming this is RMS.

So now can anyone explain me the relation of JCC based on 40,000 cycles for the same BW giving me 2.2nsec and the (2) jitter manual calculation is giving 338psec. Can Jcc be assumed peak to peak of 338pSec.

Please enlighten.

Regards

ic_engr
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.