The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 18th, 2024, 1:22am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
1/f noise- the DC value (Read 4120 times)
iVenky
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 101
Silicon Valley
1/f noise- the DC value
Mar 21st, 2013, 4:38am
 
I know that this question has been answered several times. Anyway I need some clear explanation on this. As we all know 1/f noise has more value near the DC. So obviously if you average the signal for a long time you are probably going to get some high value (at least little bit high). Does this mean that when you see a signal its DC (which is obtained by adding all values) is constantly increasing as the time progresses. This should mean that you don't have a stationary process (or in other words constant mean). I tried generating a 1/f noise using MATLAB (got the correct spectrum for 1/f noise) and I noticed this- When I summed all the data values for a some range (starting from 0) I got a non zero value. After this I increased the range and I got some other non-zero value (more than what I got before). So it should mean that its not a stationary process (and obviously as you keep on increasing the range the value keeps on increasing which indicates that at DC you should get infinity right?).
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: 1/f noise- the DC value
Reply #1 - Mar 21st, 2013, 7:20am
 
hello,
yes flicker noise has "infinite" spectral density at dc in theory, but think about dc will not be possible in the practical scenario, just because you might want to use system for some time to some time. Let's say you wanted to use for 1 year, then your lower integration limit will be 1/year in the rms power integration. once i have calculated noise power for 1sec and 1 week the difference is very less 27%, so though it looks like huge number at dc but based on the rms you get some finite number.

Unfortunately i donno creating in matlab.

Thanks,
Raj.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
iVenky
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 101
Silicon Valley
Re: 1/f noise- the DC value
Reply #2 - Mar 21st, 2013, 10:40pm
 
raja.cedt wrote on Mar 21st, 2013, 7:20am:
hello,
yes flicker noise has "infinite" spectral density at dc in theory, but think about dc will not be possible in the practical scenario, just because you might want to use system for some time to some time. Let's say you wanted to use for 1 year, then your lower integration limit will be 1/year in the rms power integration. once i have calculated noise power for 1sec and 1 week the difference is very less 27%, so though it looks like huge number at dc but based on the rms you get some finite number.

Unfortunately i donno creating in matlab.

Thanks,
Raj.


What I had done in matlab was this- I created the spectrum of 1/f noise first and then found out the ifft and created the 1/f noise. So it means that 1/f noise is somewhat related to aging of devices (which would obviously result in change in its characteristics). I read somewhere that 1/f noise is present everywhere. Do they mean the aging of the devices?


Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: 1/f noise- the DC value
Reply #3 - Mar 22nd, 2013, 12:57am
 
hello,
i don't think it's because of the aging, for example if you take a BJT(ideally it has no flicker noise) and let it run for many years still you don't see any flicker noise means for me it looks like aging is not the cause. It just because trap's in the silicon oxide interface or some other material issue.

May be you can forward the doc where did you find this aging so that i can read learn better.

Thanks,
Raj.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
Horror Vacui
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 127
Dresden, Germany
Re: 1/f noise- the DC value
Reply #4 - Mar 23rd, 2013, 11:40am
 
1/f noise has nothing to do with aging. It is due to the "traps" where the electrons run from the source to the drain. MOS devices conducts near the boundary of two material: silicon and oxide, which means plenty of irregularity in the crystalline structure. Therefore the MOS devices are more prone to 1/f noise compared to the bipolars where the electrons travels through the device within a mainly homogeneous crystalline structure. Imagine the traps as small half-sphere pits and the electrons as small balls. If the balls are fast then they will less likely to stuck in the pits. Since they have high momentum, they can get out of the pit. It's easy to see that the principle is the same if they are not sphere-like in shape. This phenomenon is present at different segments of physics and it is called generally 1/v law (I am not sure about the exact english term), where v denotes velocity. On another well know example is the radioactive decay in the nuclear plants. A so called moderator is used to slow down the electrons to spend more time near the nucleus, which increases the probability of the decay.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.