The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Sep 3rd, 2024, 7:18am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
subthreshold opamp (Read 9559 times)
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

subthreshold opamp
May 26th, 2013, 4:34am
 
If an op-amp operates in subthreshold region, will it have better offset as compared to a opamp operate in saturation region? Assuming the subthreshold opamp has larger W/L for a given current.  

I have doubt because each transistors conduct very small current in subthreshold region.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #1 - May 26th, 2013, 4:40am
 
hello,
mismatch in this region is much higher compared to inversion sat.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #2 - May 26th, 2013, 8:02am
 
May I know the reason?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
boe
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 615

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #3 - May 28th, 2013, 5:31am
 
newic,
Delta Vt has greater effect in sub-threshold op point.
- B O E
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Vladislav D
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 76
The Netherlands
Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #4 - May 28th, 2013, 8:46am
 
newic wrote on May 26th, 2013, 4:34am:
If an op-amp operates in subthreshold region, will it have better offset as compared to a opamp operate in saturation region? Assuming the subthreshold opamp has larger W/L for a given current.  

I have doubt because each transistors conduct very small current in subthreshold region.


You cannot say so. Depends on design. For example, a differential pair has more gain in a weak inversion. So, input referred offset is smaller.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Lex
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 201
Eindhoven, Holland
Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #5 - Jun 3rd, 2013, 2:21am
 
Suppose you lower the current to operate in subthreshold, the mismatch becomes higher. This is due to the effect that mismatch goes rapidly up when operating in subthreshold because of the shallow channel and effectively losing some gain as well.

I can't tell you in case the transistor area is constant and W/L is the variable. You'd have to simulate. But please bear in mind that mismatch is not that accurately modeled in subthreshold generally.

Looking forward to your sim results.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #6 - Jun 4th, 2013, 5:35am
 
the monte carlo results (1000 runs) is much better  in subthreshold region, where Vgs<Vt for a fixed current as compared to saturation where its W/L is smaller to meet Vgs>Vt+xx.

doubt on the results because of the modeling accuracy.

How could i confirm transistors are operating in subthreshold region? Some forums said that the probe Vth (LV9) is not a true threshold voltage, the actual Vth is much smaller than LV9.
something related to LV142???

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
AnalogDE
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 137

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #7 - Jun 4th, 2013, 1:52pm
 
You want your mirror devices to be operating in strong-inversion, high overdrive.  This reduces current mismatch between matched mirror devices.

You want to maximize your input pair gm -> high W/L -> low overdrive / subthreshold operation.  You need some confidence of how well the model fits for low overdrive here.  High W/L ratio -> less voltage offset and higher gain to minimize input referred offsets coming from the other matched devices in your opamp.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
newic
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 138

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #8 - Jul 26th, 2013, 10:31pm
 
so it is a matter of model accuracy for sub-threshold.
So the Vth LV9 can be used for deep submicron?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Kevin Aylward
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 52

Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #9 - Jul 27th, 2013, 1:42am
 
Matching is worse in subthreshold, although model accuracy is also a problem. Set up test current mirror and differential pair simulation, although the results are basically the same. Put a 10mv dc source in the gate or source of one of the transistors and see what the ratio difference in currents is when the current is swept. Spot numbers for a standard 220n/180n process gets ~25% mismatch for Vgst=-150mv to 8% mismatch for Vgst=+100 mv, falling to 2% mismatch at Vgst=+0.5V. Why? Well, 10 mv added on to 1/2V is a lot less than 10 mv added on to 100 mv, so mismatch goes approximately as Verror/Vgst, until it gets down to Vgst=0, where the approximation collapses, as the idealised approximation says that below threshold, current is zero! The exponential nature in subthreshold results in approximately a constant error ratio over much of the range. For general cmos design, keep Vgst above 100mv worse case, especially for current mirrors. Various performance parameters fall off below that value, although, sometimes 20 mv or so above zero Vgst may be ok. Noting that increasing W as an attempt to increase gm results in ever diminishing returns as Vgst gets below around 50mv, with a corresponding larger proportionate penalty in capacitance. Subthreshold is used because preventing subthreshold at very low currents requires very large gate lengths, which slow the system down even more that operating in subthreshold itself does. If the option is available, a bipolar is usually better for low currents, its gm is always higher, at any current.
Back to top
 
 

Kevin Aylward
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
RobG
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 570
Bozeman, MT
Re: subthreshold opamp
Reply #10 - Aug 11th, 2013, 11:10am
 
I agree with AnalogDE, but let me expand. In general, lower bias currents result in worse mismatch because the devices have to be smaller. However, for any given current the opamp topology with the least offset will have the diff pair being in subthreshold and the mirrors laving as large of Vgs-Vt as you can get away with (at some point you'll run out of headroom or mobility mismatch will dominate). In other words, maximize the diff pair gm, and minimize the mirror gm. Subthreshold operation maximizes the diff pair gm for a given current so it is best for the diff pair.

If you do the math the offset is something like AVT(DIFF)/sqrt(WDIFF*LDIFF)+ (gmDIFF/gmMirror)*AVT(MIRROR)/sqrt(WMIRROR*LMIRROR),
where AVT is the so-called Pelgrom coefficient and is the mismatch per unit area. Note the ratio of gms in the second term. The equations break down for shorter processes, but the concept is the same.

All that said, operating your diff pair in subthreshold usually limits your bandwidth. For my circuits I usually use Vgs-Vt = 150mV which is on the edge of subthreshold. Below that give diminishing returns and just starts killing your stability and bandwidth.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.