The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Jul 17th, 2024, 1:28am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation (Read 8090 times)
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Nov 26th, 2013, 3:59am
 
hi, all

I think it is common sense that we use pmjitter to simulate VCO phase noise, due to the modulated noise by the oscillator signal, if buffer/divider is followed. But after reading ken's paper about cyclostationary noise, I still have some questions about the pnoise noise type.

1.  characterizing the modulated noise at the threshold using pmjitter is for characterizing the cyclostationary noise due to the following stage, like buffer. Can i take it this way? if no, why?

2. if so, i think both fmjitter and modulated can also do the job, for they use the two-sweep approach and one of them is based on correlated type, which is also a way to characterize cyclostationary noise, according to ken's paper in page 20. Am I right? if yes, what is the difference between fmjitter and pmjitter?

3. according to one of ken's post years ago, the dominant source of phase variation is due to oscillator phase noise, which is slow and the same for all signals and can be measured using either sources or time-domain. But in my opinion, the noise here is still cyclostationary noise and should be simulated using time-domain or pmjitter. is it right?

regards,
Hao
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2013, 7:48pm by Hao Yan »  
View Profile   IP Logged
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #1 - Nov 27th, 2013, 9:17pm
 
as far as i know, analyses of fmjitter and modulated are the same. Maybe i can simply the first two questions into one, which is whether or not the fmjitter( or modulated) is applicable in phase noise simulation of oscillator with buffer/divider as the following stage?

does anyone has a clue about this? or anyother thread i can get to?

thanks in advance!
Hao

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #2 - Nov 28th, 2013, 1:12am
 
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #3 - Nov 28th, 2013, 4:34am
 
hi, Frank,

thanks for your attention. i've read these threads. But i still have two questions to be confirmed.

1. Modulated (fmjitter) has done correlated-type simulation to simulate cyclostationary noise. But the simulation is done over the whole period instead of the threshold-crossing point, which is not suitable with divider or buffer followed. right?

2. Ken has talked about two kinds of phase variation in oscillator and the first one, due to oscillator phase noise, is slow and the same over one period and can be simulated using sources.  But I think the output noise of the sole oscillator is still cyclostationary noise and should not use sources. or am i take it wrong?

best regards,
Hao
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #4 - Nov 28th, 2013, 5:15am
 
Right. Modulated and fmjitter pnoise analyses only examine a single sideband on both sides of the signal and are only suitable for sinusoidal signals with a small bandwidth.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #5 - Nov 28th, 2013, 6:26am
 
hi, Frank,

thanks again for your help! but i'm sorry i can't quite follow you here...

what do you mean by "examine a single sideband on both sides of the signal"? and is sinusoidal signal ideally a one-tone signal? i don't understand what's a sinusoidal signal with small bandwidth.

thanks,
Hao
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #6 - Nov 28th, 2013, 7:23am
 
It means that only the frequencies around the fundamental of your signal will be taken into account for the result, but not the harmonics. It is like having a narrow bandpass filter around the fundamental frequency of your signal.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #7 - Nov 28th, 2013, 7:36am
 
oh, i see~

but in this case, I think the phase noise result from fmjitter/modulated would be better than that from pmjitter, as it just takes the fundamental part into consideration.

but in my design which is a cross-coupled LC VCO, the fmjitter result is about 1.5 dBc worse than the pmjitter. do you have any idea about this?

best regards!
Hao
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 678
Munich, Germany
Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #8 - Nov 29th, 2013, 12:26am
 
Well, the bandpass-filtered signal is different from the original one, so it's no surprise that the jitter is also different.

Which of the two results is relevant for you depends on how you are going to use the output signal. If you are going to use a narrow bandpass filter to obtain a sinusoidal signal, fmjitter or modulated gives you the correct information. If you are going to use the output signal directly to trigger some other circuit having a certain threshold voltage, then the pmjitter result is relevant for you.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Hao Yan
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 6

Re: Noise type in Pnoise for VCO phase noise simulation
Reply #9 - Dec 2nd, 2013, 4:04am
 
Thank you, Frank!

i think it's clear for me about how to set up my simulation. thank you very much!

wish you a good day!
Hao
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.